2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olopatadine hydrochloride loaded Kollidon® SR nanoparticles for ocular delivery: Nanosuspension formulation and in vitro–in vivo evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with other polymeric nano-formulations with variant polymer ratios such as NP-1, NP-2, NP-3, it was found NP-2 exhibited high drug loading efficiency, along with increasing drug release pattern. Later it was concluded that the formulation could deliver the drug for a longer duration of time, at a sustained rate [ 57 ].…”
Section: Need For Nanomedicine For Ocular Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with other polymeric nano-formulations with variant polymer ratios such as NP-1, NP-2, NP-3, it was found NP-2 exhibited high drug loading efficiency, along with increasing drug release pattern. Later it was concluded that the formulation could deliver the drug for a longer duration of time, at a sustained rate [ 57 ].…”
Section: Need For Nanomedicine For Ocular Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release profile showed maximum release of 90% in 48 h, while without nanosuspension, time reached 3 h. In addition, the retention study revealed that nanoparticles were washed off the cornea surface within 24 h, but the retention time of drugs has been increased rather than a solution without nanoparticles. Prolonged drug release and retention enhanced patient compliance [ 95 ].…”
Section: Nanoparticles As Biodegradable Nanocarriers For Cornea Drmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the formulation prepared using Eudragit ® RL 100 showed higher EE% than Eudragit ® RS 100 but this difference is not significant (p = 0.22). Several factors can be affect successful entrapment of drug in the NPs; these contain, low drug solubility in the aqueous phase; fast precipitation rate of polymer(s) in the aqueous phase, low viscosity of the internal phase, as well as, drug solubility in the polymer [31][32][33].…”
Section: Measurement Of Ps Pdi Zp and Eementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete solution was filtered through 0.22 μm polyamid filter and analyzed using HPLC. Drug content was expressed as EE (%) following Equation 1 [3,32]. EE% = (Actual amount of CVL loaded in NPs / Theoretical amount of CVL loaded in NPs) x 100 Eq.…”
Section: Assessment Of Entrapment Efficiency (Ee)mentioning
confidence: 99%