2010
DOI: 10.7183/1045-6635.21.3.290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Olmec” Head Shapes among the Preclassic Period Maya and Cultural Meanings

Abstract: This paper analyzes the biographical and related archaeological information of 10 artificially shaped skulls from the broader Maya area, which bear resemblance to the high and narrow head morphology depicted in Olmec art. The skeletal evidence of this head form, which was accomplished by combining compression cradleboards with constricting horizontal wraps (tabular erect type in its pseudo-circular variety), is rare and predates A.D. 250 in all cases. Here I compare the cranial vaults shaped in this fashion wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we have argued elsewhere (García and Tiesler 2011;Tiesler 2010Tiesler , 2011Tiesler , 2012Tiesler , 2014Tiesler and Cucina 2010) that artificially produced head shapes constituted a widespread and highly visible body emblem of Maya group identification, especially during the Classic period, when culturally modified head forms reached a peak both in popularity and diversity. Unlike most other forms of body modification, cranial vault modeling bridges the generations, as it is performed by second-or third-generation adult practitioners on their infant kin who then carry the resulting artifical head shape for the remainder of their lives.…”
Section: Artificial Head Shapesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As we have argued elsewhere (García and Tiesler 2011;Tiesler 2010Tiesler , 2011Tiesler , 2012Tiesler , 2014Tiesler and Cucina 2010) that artificially produced head shapes constituted a widespread and highly visible body emblem of Maya group identification, especially during the Classic period, when culturally modified head forms reached a peak both in popularity and diversity. Unlike most other forms of body modification, cranial vault modeling bridges the generations, as it is performed by second-or third-generation adult practitioners on their infant kin who then carry the resulting artifical head shape for the remainder of their lives.…”
Section: Artificial Head Shapesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The skeletal analyses indicate a population that was on average slightly taller than most Maya inland groups, a tendency that has been associated with better nutritional conditions likely associated with greater marine protein intake, as evidenced by the large amount of terrestrial and marine skeletal remains encountered at the site (Sierra Sosa 2004;Tiesler 2001;Tiesler et al 2002). It is unmistakable that diet was fairly well balanced between carbohydrate and protein consumption, as the combined evidence of a high level of carious lesions and zooarchaeological remains indicate (Cucina et al 2011b;Götz 2006;Götz and Sierra 2012).…”
Section: Lifestyle and Physiological Stressmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Already among the Gulf Coast Olmecs, artificially contrived, pear-shaped head looks appear to be highlighted by shaving (Tiesler 2010). During the next millennium, Classic Maya small-scale portraiture still adheres to this morphological exaltation when representing strongly reclined heads partly or completely foliated.…”
Section: Head Practices Beauty and Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sometimes, the hand-crafted head shapes were further emphasized by specific hair arrangements or eye-catching headwear that drew attention to the permanently transformed organic substrate Stresser-Péan 2011, p. 136). Also in the Mesoamerican sphere, such head-formadapted headdresses were common among the Preclassic Olmec, Classic Mixtequilla people and Classic period Maya, as figurines and vase paintings testify (Acosta et al 1992;Cheetham 2008;Taube and Taube 2008;Tiesler 2010).…”
Section: Head Practices Beauty and Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%