PsycEXTRA Dataset 2008
DOI: 10.1037/e578332012-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Older Adults' Training Preferences for Learning to Use Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also stressed the importance of engaging in hands-on learning activities. This finding supports those of others (Callahan, Kiker, & Cross, 2003; Mitzer et al, 2008) that indicated that an active learning process is optimal for older learners. Our participants also indicated that access to feedback was important.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They also stressed the importance of engaging in hands-on learning activities. This finding supports those of others (Callahan, Kiker, & Cross, 2003; Mitzer et al, 2008) that indicated that an active learning process is optimal for older learners. Our participants also indicated that access to feedback was important.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…According to the selective engagement theory [21], people would become more selective in how they allocate their cognitive resources with age. It could be related to a well-supported fact that the older adults are less willing to learn technology via trail-and-error compared to other training methods such as reading a printed manual [40]. The Diffusion of Innovation theory [41] points out that trialability or testability are keys for potential adopters to evaluate an innovation, and it would predict that older adults are less likely to be early adopters of new technology (e.g., robots) compared to younger adults because older adults might be less willing to actually use it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions were followed by a discussion of training, which is not the focus of the present paper (see Mitzner et al, 2008). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%