Proceedings of the Workshop at SIGGRAPH Asia 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2425296.2425312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Older adults' attitudes toward homes service robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing and sketch methods can afford older adults an opportunity to influence novel robot form factors from the inception of the design process (Frascara, 2002). Although drawing and sketch components of PD studies place low demands on working memory, some participants may be apprehensive or unable to draw or sketch their preferred robot by themselves (DiSalvo et al, 2008; Ng et al, 2012). In some studies, participants drew or sketched a robot that looked and functioned in a manner that they deemed appropriate (e.g., Rose & Björling, 2017).…”
Section: Participatory Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing and sketch methods can afford older adults an opportunity to influence novel robot form factors from the inception of the design process (Frascara, 2002). Although drawing and sketch components of PD studies place low demands on working memory, some participants may be apprehensive or unable to draw or sketch their preferred robot by themselves (DiSalvo et al, 2008; Ng et al, 2012). In some studies, participants drew or sketched a robot that looked and functioned in a manner that they deemed appropriate (e.g., Rose & Björling, 2017).…”
Section: Participatory Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to successfully assimilate new technology depends on users' absorption or purchase of information, as well as their ability to exploit this information (Kouki et al, 2010). In reviewing the literature, Zafrani and Nimrod (2019) pointed out that the majority of HRI studies in later life were snapshot studies that lasted one day, thus, they mainly focused on acceptance rather than on assimilation (Ng et al, 2012;Šabanović et al, 2013).…”
Section: Types Of Research In Hrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prominent intervening constraints described in the literature were affordability and usability. Concern over robot costs was expressed often (Abbott et al, 2019;Ng et al, 2012;Padir et al, 2015). Community-dwelling adults were doubtful about buying a robot but could imagine renting one for a short period if needed (Fischinger et al, 2016), while senior home residents, who considered robots vis-à-vis human caregivers, thought it would be more reasonable for both financial and functional reasons to hire more staff than to acquire a robot (Compagna & Kohlbacher, 2015).…”
Section: Human-robot Interaction (Hri) In Later Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review resulted in the understanding that cleaning help was the most required assistance in the household (Pigini 2012, Beer 2012, Ng 2012 followed by reaching for things and carrying them (Choi 2009, Telson 2013, Beer 2012, Pigini 2012, Fischinger 2016 or holding things in an assistive capacity (Pigini 2012, Beer 2012. Since potential users, through the literature, generally accept that that a robot could be useful in a household, the activities with the planned focus groups would serve to confirm the literature and help inform the necessary acceptance criteria which can be structured according to the TAM.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%