2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1068-3_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offshore Design Approaches and Model Tests for Sub-Failure Cyclic Loading of Foundations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under average compressive load, the foundation displaced downwards continously and the rate of displacement (Δw max/d)/ΔΝ remained constant and generally lower than 0.2% throughout the test. These results are consistent with other published findings that the direction of vertical displacement of a skirted foundation depends on the average vertical stress rather than the maximum vertical stress (Bye et al 1995, Byrne & Houlsby 2002, Kelly et al 2006, Randolph 2012.…”
Section: Comparison Of Foundation Response Under Cyclic Loading In Avsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under average compressive load, the foundation displaced downwards continously and the rate of displacement (Δw max/d)/ΔΝ remained constant and generally lower than 0.2% throughout the test. These results are consistent with other published findings that the direction of vertical displacement of a skirted foundation depends on the average vertical stress rather than the maximum vertical stress (Bye et al 1995, Byrne & Houlsby 2002, Kelly et al 2006, Randolph 2012.…”
Section: Comparison Of Foundation Response Under Cyclic Loading In Avsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The contours of maximum shear strain, γmax, are presented as a function of maximum shear stress, τmax, normalised by the monotonic DSS strength, s u. The DSS tests used to develop the contour diagram are considered relevant here as DSS strength can be considered as an average strength between triaxial compression and triaxial extension (Mayne 1985, Randolph 2012. The DSS strength is considered representative of the range of stress paths in the soil surrounding and beneath a shallow foundation and therefore of the soil strength mobilised by a foundation at failure.…”
Section: Failure Criteria On a Shear Strain Contour Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSS tests were chosen in this study as this type of tests is generally preferred in offshore geotechnical site investigation due to the efficiency of sample size and as shear strength from monotonic DSS tests, or simple shear tests, is considered approximately equal to the average soil strength in triaxial compression and extension (Mayne 1985, Randolph 2012 and therefore applicable to a range of stress paths encountered beneath a shallow foundation. It is noted that DSS tests (Bjerrum & Landva 1966) and simple shear tests (Joer et al 2011, Carraro 2017 are distinguished based on the boundary conditions on the specimen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-amplitude repetitive drained loading may hinder the longterm performance of engineered and natural systems (Lekarp and Dawson 1998;Suiker et al 2005;Okamoto et al 2018;Maqsood et al 2020;Wang et al 2020;Zhao et al 2020;Postill et al 2021). The study of soil responses to repetitive mechanical loads has taken place in the context of highway design (Pell 1973;Sharp and Booker 1984;Brown 1996;Miller et al 2000;Nowamooz et al 2013), machine foundations (Anderson 2009), oil platforms (Bjerrum 1966), grain silos (Rahal and Vuez 1998), and wind turbine foundations (White and Lehane 2004;LeBlanc et al 2010;Cuéllar et al 2012;Randolph 2012;He et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%