2016
DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offenders in emerging adulthood: School maladjustment, childhood adversities, and prediction of aggressive antisocial behaviors.

Abstract: Early psychosocial adversities and maladjustment, such as childhood maltreatment and school adjustment problems, have been linked to an increased risk of aggressive antisocial behaviors. Yet, clinical studies of subjects at the highest risk of persistence in such behaviors are rare, especially during the life-changing transition years of emerging adulthood. This study describes early predictors of aggressive antisocial behaviors in a large, nationally representative cohort of Swedish, male violent offenders in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Children with an overall score from 0 to 9 are termed "stable," while those with a score of 10-19 are termed "unsettled" and those with a score of 20 or more are called "maladjusted." In our sample, at age 7, 67.3% of children were categorized as stable at baseline, 21.2% as above the threshold for unsettled (a score of [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], and 11.4% as above the threshold for maladjusted (a score of 20 or more). Due to the possibility of left-censoring, whereby participants could enter the study already showing signs of social or behavioral instability or maladjustment which could have affected their engagement in creative activities, we just worked with data from children who were identified as stable at baseline, providing a final sample of 7558 participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children with an overall score from 0 to 9 are termed "stable," while those with a score of 10-19 are termed "unsettled" and those with a score of 20 or more are called "maladjusted." In our sample, at age 7, 67.3% of children were categorized as stable at baseline, 21.2% as above the threshold for unsettled (a score of [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], and 11.4% as above the threshold for maladjusted (a score of 20 or more). Due to the possibility of left-censoring, whereby participants could enter the study already showing signs of social or behavioral instability or maladjustment which could have affected their engagement in creative activities, we just worked with data from children who were identified as stable at baseline, providing a final sample of 7558 participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two hundred seventy male offenders gave informed consent among 380 possible participants, resulting in a 71% response rate. A more detailed presentation of this project is given by Wallinius and coauthors (25). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All male inmates aged 18-25 were invited to participate in the study; inmates with insufficient language skills and those who were relocated before the data could be safely collected were excluded. The participation rate was 71% of all who met inclusion criteria, and in-depth descriptions of the total DAABS cohort (n = 269) are available in previous publications (e.g., Wallinius et al, 2016;Billstedt et al, 2017;Hofvander et al, 2017). In the total DAABS cohort, the majority of the offenders had a non-sexual violent history, with only n = 31 offenders reporting an offense history of sexual offenses .…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%