2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/gvhs2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-world mental health: considerations for the design of wellbeing supportive technologies for deep space exploration

Abstract: During future long duration space exploration missions, humans will be exposed to combinations of extreme physical, psychological and interpersonal demands. These demands create risks for safety, performance, health, and wellbeing of both individuals and crew. The communication latency in deep space means that explorers will increasingly have to operate independently and take responsibility for their own self-care and self-management. At present, several research programmes are focused on developing and testin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several researchers have commented on the appropriateness and design of monitoring tools, highlighting that they need to feel acceptable to crew (Goemaere et al, 2019); transparent about reasons behind recommendations (Smith et al, 2023); and primarily for crew use rather than mission control (Johannes and van Baarsen, 2020). Some astronauts dislike psychological monitoring and may even attempt to give false results (Slack et al, 2016), likely because poor scores can threaten their careers (Kanas and Manzey, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have commented on the appropriateness and design of monitoring tools, highlighting that they need to feel acceptable to crew (Goemaere et al, 2019); transparent about reasons behind recommendations (Smith et al, 2023); and primarily for crew use rather than mission control (Johannes and van Baarsen, 2020). Some astronauts dislike psychological monitoring and may even attempt to give false results (Slack et al, 2016), likely because poor scores can threaten their careers (Kanas and Manzey, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%