1991
DOI: 10.1109/26.87141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OFDM for data communication over mobile radio FM channels. I. Analysis and experimental results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it is shown that the downlink data rate requirements of emerging wireless standards can be achieved. For example, 1 Gbps downlink data throughput is achieved with area cost of the iterative detector-decoder of approximately 73 mm 2 and with power dissipation of about 2 W , if 0.13 μm CMOS technology is utilized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it is shown that the downlink data rate requirements of emerging wireless standards can be achieved. For example, 1 Gbps downlink data throughput is achieved with area cost of the iterative detector-decoder of approximately 73 mm 2 and with power dissipation of about 2 W , if 0.13 μm CMOS technology is utilized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve this, it is proposed that multiple transmit antennas are accompanied with multiple receive antennas forming multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) wireless transceivers [1]. Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) transmission scheme [2] has been widely accepted for future wireless standards. It transforms highly scattering channel environments into frequency non-selective sub-carrier channels that are equalized with decent computational complexity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(34) we can immediately recognize that the received signal can be expressed in exactly the same form as eq. (6). Therefore the algorithm properties do not change with respect to a static clock phase error shorter than T,.…”
Section: Static Clock Phase Errormentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This can be explained by the fact that this channel has a larger delay-spread than 2 Note that if for some channels D < L we will notice some performance degradation, if the receiver doesn't compensate for the intersymbol interference due to the small guard period. 3 In [3] ZP-OFDM significantly outperformed CP-OFDM (both with IDFT), but the authors of [3] evaluated coded performance with a receiver employing the turbo principle.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The replacement of the cyclic prefix with zero-padding, has the advantage that the symbol recovery is guaranteed even in the case of channel nulls on a subcarrier. On the other hand, it requires employing a receiver more sophisticated than the DFT-based receiver [2]. It has been shown, however, in [3] that by using a complex iterative receiver, ZP-OFDM outperforms CP-OFDM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%