Odziv na “Anketo o slovenščini” projekta Jezikovna politika Republike Slovenije in potrebe uporabnikov

Logar, Nataša; Gantar, Polona; Holdt, Špela Arhar; Gorjanc, Vojko; Kosem, Iztok; Krek, Simon; Stabej, Marko

doi:10.4312/slo2.0.2017.1.27-37

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2017, a large-scale national survey on the use of and expectations from language resources (Gliha Komac 2017), completed by over 5953 participants (3204 in full), was conducted, but unfortunately due to severe methodological shortcomings and bias (cf. Logar et al 2017), the results have very limited value. Interestingly, in nearly all other countries participating in the survey, dictionary use research is as underdeveloped as in Slovenia, or is even non-existent.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Attitudes of Slovenian Language Users Towards General Monolingual Dictionaries: an International Perspective

Kosem

Wolfer

Lew

et al. 2018

SLO2.0

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the results of a survey on dictionary use in Europe, the largest survey of dictionary use to date with nearly 10,000 participants in nearly thirty countries. The paper focuses on the comparison of the results of the Slovenian participants with the results of the participants from other European countries. The comparisons are made both with the European averages, and with the results from individual countries, in order to determine in which aspects Slovenian participants share similarities with other dictionary users (and non-users) around Europe, and in which aspects they differ. The findings show that in many ways the Slovenian users are similar to their European counterparts, with some noticeable exceptions, including (much) stronger preference for digital dictionaries over print ones, above-average reliance on other people when dictionary does not contain the relevant information, and the largest difference between the price of a dictionary and the amount willing to spend on it.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%