Springer Handbook of Odor 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26932-0_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Odor Descriptions from a Language Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Gladkova and Romero‐Trillo (2014) found differences between the applications of beautiful and its Russian and Spanish equivalents. Recently, Nuessli Guth and Runte (2017) revealed that German speakers use roughly 1000 adjectives to describe taste but only 600 to describe smell. In isolation, findings such as these could arguably be construed as more broadly motivated by a shared culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Gladkova and Romero‐Trillo (2014) found differences between the applications of beautiful and its Russian and Spanish equivalents. Recently, Nuessli Guth and Runte (2017) revealed that German speakers use roughly 1000 adjectives to describe taste but only 600 to describe smell. In isolation, findings such as these could arguably be construed as more broadly motivated by a shared culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eating enjoyment, considered here as an interactional practice, can also be understood as part of a range of embodied behaviors that are intersubjective and observable phenomena (Majid and Levinson, 2011) through the ways in which they are interactionally organized (Mondada, 2018). In this way, the paper aims to contribute to emerging linguistics work on “sensory practices,” rather than senses per se (e.g., Guth and Runte, 2017; Mann, 2018). Previous discursive work on food pleasure has begun to examine how the enjoyment of food can be understood theoretically as an interactional achievement; something that is worked-up and collaboratively produced in talk rather than an automatic process (Wiggins, 2002; Sneijder and te Molder, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%