2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Octree-based region growing for point cloud segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
280
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 478 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
280
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ackermann and Troisi (2010) used a region growing approach to segment planar pitched roofs in 3D point clouds for automatic 3D modelling of buildings. Anh-Vu Vo et al (2015) presented an octree-based region growing approach for a fast surface patch segmentation of urban environment 3D point clouds.…”
Section: Region Growing Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ackermann and Troisi (2010) used a region growing approach to segment planar pitched roofs in 3D point clouds for automatic 3D modelling of buildings. Anh-Vu Vo et al (2015) presented an octree-based region growing approach for a fast surface patch segmentation of urban environment 3D point clouds.…”
Section: Region Growing Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summarily, the relevant point cloud segmentation approaches can be grouped into three major categories: the model-based methods, the region growingbased methods, and the clustering-based methods (Vo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 was selected to illustrate the proposed method (Fig. 3a. After the data points of the structural members were separate from the larger data set (step 1.1), a region growing-based octree [19] was used to extract point clouds of the flange/web data of the structural member (step 1.2). The segmentation results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b). A region-growing based octree method [19] was employed to extract the surface containing surface loss or holes (step 1.2) (Fig. 5c).…”
Section: Surface Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%