2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OCR-Nets: Variants of Pre-trained CNN for Urdu Handwritten Character Recognition via Transfer Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantitative results for hybrid dataset are presented in [19] 92.09% 7.1% Neural network [19] 91.98% 8.02% SVM [19] 95.79% 4.21% CNN [19] 96.7% 3.3% Autoencoder [19] 97.3% 2.7% Guassian NB [19] 69.3% 30.7% Decision Tree [19] 82.00% 18% Daubechies wavelet [59] 92.05% 7.95% Fuzzy rule [60] 97.4% 2.6% HMM (Hidden Markov Model) [60] 96.2% 3.8% Hybrid approach (Fuzzy and HMM) [60] 97.8% 2.5% Fuzzy rule base approach [61] 96.3% [19] 81.2% ---18.8% CNN [19] 86.6% ---13.4% CNN [33] 80.7% ---19.3% SVM [33] 56% ---44.0% ANN [33] 78% ---22.0% LeNet [62] 90.34% ---9.70% SVM with polynomial kernel on 40x36 [63] 88.80 % ---11.20% SVM with Transfer Learning [64] 82.30% ---17.7% BLSTM [65] 92-94% ---8 -6% OCR-GoogleNet [64] 94.7% to be effective in a variety of domains of recognition tasks, computer vision, including textile image analysis, in recent years.…”
Section: Results For Hybrid Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative results for hybrid dataset are presented in [19] 92.09% 7.1% Neural network [19] 91.98% 8.02% SVM [19] 95.79% 4.21% CNN [19] 96.7% 3.3% Autoencoder [19] 97.3% 2.7% Guassian NB [19] 69.3% 30.7% Decision Tree [19] 82.00% 18% Daubechies wavelet [59] 92.05% 7.95% Fuzzy rule [60] 97.4% 2.6% HMM (Hidden Markov Model) [60] 96.2% 3.8% Hybrid approach (Fuzzy and HMM) [60] 97.8% 2.5% Fuzzy rule base approach [61] 96.3% [19] 81.2% ---18.8% CNN [19] 86.6% ---13.4% CNN [33] 80.7% ---19.3% SVM [33] 56% ---44.0% ANN [33] 78% ---22.0% LeNet [62] 90.34% ---9.70% SVM with polynomial kernel on 40x36 [63] 88.80 % ---11.20% SVM with Transfer Learning [64] 82.30% ---17.7% BLSTM [65] 92-94% ---8 -6% OCR-GoogleNet [64] 94.7% to be effective in a variety of domains of recognition tasks, computer vision, including textile image analysis, in recent years.…”
Section: Results For Hybrid Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third solution in this context lies in the use of TL [64][65][66]76]. TL was less widely adopted in AHR compared to other techniques, and its benefits have been limited due to the use of models pre-trained on ImageNet, a dataset distant from the specifics of AHR.…”
Section: Highlights and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arif and Poruran [66] employed TL in two architectures referred to as OCR-AlexNet and OCR-GoogleNet, adapted from the original architectures of AlexNet and GoogleNet. In the case of OCR-AlexNet, the initial layer weights of AlexNet were retained, while adjustments were made to the final three layers to tailor them to the new task.…”
Section: Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this matrix, each pixel is an element of the matrix. In a three channel color image, this element is a tuple of three numbers [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Operating Principle and Characteristics Of Ocr Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%