Dr Wood's Commentary (Wood, 2018) provides six reasons to question the usefulness of P crit and proposes alternative ṀO 2 versus P O2 analyses as its replacement. While we agree with some of Dr Wood's arguments, we feel that none of them warrant abandoning P crit , especially in favour of his proposed alternatives, which provide different information than P crit . A more useful way forward would involve (1) clearly defining P crit , to avoid misinterpretation, and (2) standardizing (or at least clearly describing) the methods used to determine and report P crit , to optimize its comparative value. This topic demands further discussion because Dr Wood's conclusion could have unwarranted influence on how future hypoxia research is conducted and past hypoxia research is interpreted.Dr Wood's arguments are either theoretical (reasons 3-6) or methodological (reasons 1, 2). The theoretical arguments, if true, may warrant the abandonment of P crit . However, contrary to Dr Wood's claims, across species, P crit is strongly correlated with the environmental O 2 level to which species are exposed and is therefore ecologically relevant (Childress and Seibel, 1998;Mandic et al., 2009;Wishner et al., 2018). P crit is also correlated with multiple steps of the O 2 transport cascade, from gill surface area through haemoglobin P 50 to mitochondrial P 50 (Childress and Seibel, 1998;Lau et al., 2017;Mandic et al., 2009), and is a sensitive measure of an animal's overall ability to extract O 2 because altering physiological traits along the cascade can change P crit . For example, anatomical restructuring of the gill to favour O 2 diffusion [e.g. reducing gill epithelial thickness through seawater acclimation in sculpins (Henriksson et al., 2008); increasing lamellar surface area through hypoxia acclimation in crucian carp (Sollid et al., 2003)] can lower P crit . These relationships between P crit and plastic traits along the O 2 transport cascade clearly reflect the physiological relevance of P crit and indicate that P critespecially when it shifts with acclimationdoes indeed represent the P O2 at which O 2 uptake becomes constrained. Therefore, contrary to reason 6, P crit per se does carry biologically relevant information. Hence, P crit remains a useful tool for understanding hypoxic performance because it allows for predictive statements.Much of Dr Wood's reasoning centres on the over-interpretation of P crit . P crit does not necessarily quantify an animal's overall hypoxia tolerance (the product of some combination of aerobic metabolism, anaerobic metabolism and metabolic depression; reason 5), reveal what biological processes the O 2 consumed at P crit is supporting (reason 4), or indicate the onset P O2 of enhanced glycolytic reliance (reason 4) or metabolic depression (reason 5).These ideas have long been excluded from the definition of P crit . Simply, P crit defines the lowest water P O2 at which the animal can maintain some benchmark ṀO 2 state (e.g. ṀO 2,std , the ṀO 2 of an inactive and post-absorptive ectotherm...