2019
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Don't throw the fish out with the respirometry water

Abstract: Dr Wood's Commentary (Wood, 2018) provides six reasons to question the usefulness of P crit and proposes alternative ṀO 2 versus P O2 analyses as its replacement. While we agree with some of Dr Wood's arguments, we feel that none of them warrant abandoning P crit , especially in favour of his proposed alternatives, which provide different information than P crit . A more useful way forward would involve (1) clearly defining P crit , to avoid misinterpretation, and (2) standardizing (or at least clearly descri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2C). Also, it is not clear that this parameter has any particular meaning when applied to whole animal M O2 , unlike its meaning in enzyme kinetics (Regan et al, 2019). In addition, the use of the parameter b assumes that the model fits the data well and that the upper asymptote of the MM function represents a definite, physiological maximum, neither of which were true in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2C). Also, it is not clear that this parameter has any particular meaning when applied to whole animal M O2 , unlike its meaning in enzyme kinetics (Regan et al, 2019). In addition, the use of the parameter b assumes that the model fits the data well and that the upper asymptote of the MM function represents a definite, physiological maximum, neither of which were true in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Wood (2018) questioned the usefulness of the P crit concept based on two main concerns: uncertainty of its biological meaning and lack of standardization in its determination. The purpose of this study is not to argue the biological relevance of P crit , as this concern has been addressed (Regan et al, 2019): rather, the purpose of this study is to evaluate analytical methods used to determine P crit from respirometric data. Traditionally, P crit has been estimated the intersection of two straight lines, one fit to a region where M O2 is relatively independent of P O2 and a second line describing the decrease in M O2 at low P O2 (Yeager and Ultsch 1989; Rogers et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marcusenius victoriae 's p crit‐EOD (15.14 mmHg) is not significantly different from its p crit‐MR and further supports the hypothesis that this population of fish consists of swamp specialists. In addition, the concurrence of the p crit‐MR and the p crit‐EOD , the critical oxygen tension of a biologically relevant aerobic rate process, supports the use of p crit‐MR as an informative metric of hypoxia tolerance (Regan et al ., ; Wood, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This point is commonly termed p crit to denote the critical partial pressure of oxygen ( p O 2 ). p crit is often used as a metric for hypoxia tolerance and correlates well with other hypoxia tolerance measures, such as aquatic surface respiration thresholds and haemoglobin concentrations (Chapman et al ., ; Chapman & Mckenzie, ; Fish, ; Regan et al ., ). Because critical thresholds may exist for other oxygen‐dependent rate processes, the metabolic rate (MR) critical threshold is herein referred to as p crit‐MR .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ratio of environmental PO2 to Pcrit, normalized for temperature, provides a direct measure of aerobic scope that is believed to constrain the viability of current and future habitat (Deutsch et al, 2015;Deutsch et al, 2020). However, hypoxia and tolerance are subjective, time-dependent terms while Pcrit is inconsistently defined and determined, resulting in debate about its meaning and significance (Wood, 2018;Regan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%