2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence of Mycobacterium spp. and other pathogens in lymph nodes of slaughtered swine and wild boars (Sus scrofa)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
3
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
66
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar observation was recently described in a study where 31% of Mycobacterium-positive lymph nodes of slaughter pigs did not show any visible lesions (56). This is interesting, considering that Mycobacteria are usually diagnosed only during postmortem examination in the slaughter process (57,58). The presence of Mycobacteria in groups other than granulomatous ICLNs might represent an early stage of pathological alteration which is not yet morphologically identifiable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A similar observation was recently described in a study where 31% of Mycobacterium-positive lymph nodes of slaughter pigs did not show any visible lesions (56). This is interesting, considering that Mycobacteria are usually diagnosed only during postmortem examination in the slaughter process (57,58). The presence of Mycobacteria in groups other than granulomatous ICLNs might represent an early stage of pathological alteration which is not yet morphologically identifiable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The presence of Rhodococcus equi has been reported more frequently in lesions suspected of Mycobacterium infection (Alban et al, 2008; EFSA Panels on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), 2011; Komijn et al, 1999;Komijn et al, 2007;. Although the prevalence of Rhodococcus equi has not been documented in Canadian swine, we suspect that this infection is common in MLNs with granulomatous lesions as it is in other countries (Lara et al, 2011;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A total of 874 suspected lesions of tuberculosis in MLNs, lung, thoracic or mesenteric lymph nodes were systematically submitted to Mycobacterium culture over the period 2007-2011: M. bovis was detected in 12.8% of them, M. avium in 11.7%, whereas the culture was negative in 48.2% and inconclusive in 27.3%. Generally, M. avium seems the species most often involved in mycobacterial of swine (Alvarez et al, 2011;Eisenberg et al, 2012;Johansen, Agdestein, Lium, Jorgensen, & Djonne, 2014;Lara et al, 2011;. In Argentina though, M. bovis was the most frequent species observed in pigs (Barandiaran et al, 2015), followed by co-infection with M. avium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subspecies MAA and MAH can cause diverse disseminated infections, tuberculosis-like illnesses, lymphadenitis and osteomyelitis in animals and in humans [4]. MAA and MAH have been the most frequently isolated mycobacterial species from tuberculous lesions in slaughtered pigs and cattle [4,[42][43]. Reports on MAH isolates from pigs and humans being closely related [44][45][46][47][48], and the fact that a common source of MAH infection in these two mammalian species is yet to be identifi ed, reinforce the theory generated by the present study that porcine intestinal organs or pork meat can be a potential source of human MAH infection [27].…”
Section: Mac and Infection In Humans And Pigsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…colici) on post-mortem examination [8,22,54,[59][60][61][62]. Similar lesions can be caused by other nonmycobacterial agents, such as Rhodococcus equi, Streptococcus spp., Corynebacterium spp., or various enterobacteria [42,63]. The size of granulomas in pigs infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp.…”
Section: Mac Diagnostics -Main Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%