1970
DOI: 10.1136/gut.11.12.1035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence of an abnormal lipoprotein in patients with liver disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no peak in the position of LP-X with agarose column chromatography, and no particles like LP-X were seen on electron microscopy. Many other patients with 'cholestasis' have been reported to have had no detectable LP-X in the plasma (Magnani & Alaupovic, 1976;Vergani, Pietrogrande & Grondona, 1973;Ross, Murphy, Wilkinson, Mills & Sherlock, 1970;Ritland, Blomhoff, Elgjo & Gjone, 1973;Mordasini, Berthold, Schlumpf, Keller & Riva, 1975). Seidel (1976) has also claimed that the con centration of LP-X in plasma does not correlate with LCAT activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There was no peak in the position of LP-X with agarose column chromatography, and no particles like LP-X were seen on electron microscopy. Many other patients with 'cholestasis' have been reported to have had no detectable LP-X in the plasma (Magnani & Alaupovic, 1976;Vergani, Pietrogrande & Grondona, 1973;Ross, Murphy, Wilkinson, Mills & Sherlock, 1970;Ritland, Blomhoff, Elgjo & Gjone, 1973;Mordasini, Berthold, Schlumpf, Keller & Riva, 1975). Seidel (1976) has also claimed that the con centration of LP-X in plasma does not correlate with LCAT activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…LpX elevations are quite common in patients with cholestatic liver diseases, occurring in up to 45% of such patients [16]. While up to 41% of patients with PSC have been reported to have TC levels greater than the 95th percentile, extreme elevations are less frequently encountered but generate significant therapeutic uncertainty [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since complete obstruc tion of extrahepatic bile ducts is proved in infants with biliary atresia, it is no wonder that all the infants with the illness are Lp-X positive in high concentrations. However, in adults with extrahepatic biliary obstruction, the proportion of patients positive for Lp-X varies from 65% to 100% (Ross et al 1970;Vergani et al 1973;Seidel et al 1973a). Such differences may reflect incomplete obstruction, in various degrees, of the extrahepatic biliary tract in patients examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative reaction to Lp-X has never been reported in infants with extrahepatic biliary atresia having no hepatic decompensation (Poley et al 1973), while in those with neonatal hepatitis syndrome, including paucity of the intrahepatic bile duct, Lp-X has been demonstrated to be undetectable, or much lower in concentration than in those with biliary atresia (Poley et al 1973; Magani and Alaupovic 1976). However, there is some controversy on the usefulness 210 Y. Tazawa and T. Konno of the Lp-X test in differential diagnosis of obstructive jaundice (Ross et al 1970;Vergani et al 1973). In this study, we determined serum Lp-X levels in infants with neonatal hepatitis or biliary atresia, and found semiquantitative determina tion of serum Lp-X valuable in differential diagnosis of these diseases, especially in their early stages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%