1949
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.39.11.1458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence and Distribution of Types of C. diphtheriae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1956
1956
1956
1956

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since October 1948, when routine typing was begun, more than 90 percent of the cultures from that county and almost 70 percent of the cultures from neighboring counties have been gravis strains. The findings are in sharp contrast to the diphtheria flora usually encountered in other areas of the United States (12)(13)(14). Moreover, the serologic studies reported by Hermann and Parsons (15) indicate that the gravis strains isolated in north Georgia are closely related antigenically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Since October 1948, when routine typing was begun, more than 90 percent of the cultures from that county and almost 70 percent of the cultures from neighboring counties have been gravis strains. The findings are in sharp contrast to the diphtheria flora usually encountered in other areas of the United States (12)(13)(14). Moreover, the serologic studies reported by Hermann and Parsons (15) indicate that the gravis strains isolated in north Georgia are closely related antigenically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%