Occupational mobility over the business cycle

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to examine how occupational mobility varies over the business cycle and how selected factors contribute to occupational mobility in different stages of the business cycle. Design/methodology/approach -Using annual micro data from the Estonian Labour Force Survey (2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) and implementing probit models with interaction terms, the paper investigates occupational mobility as a change of occupation in two successive years during recovery, boom and recession periods. Findings -The analysis indicates that occupational mobility is higher during the recovery and boom periods and lower during the recession stage. The demographic characteristics (gender, marital status, knowledge of local language) influence the probability for occupational change during the recovery stage of the business cycle. The position of employees in the occupational hierarchy is significant during the recovery and boom periods. Employees working in the public sector have a lower probability for occupational change compared with private sector employees during the recession. Training has a positive effect on occupational mobility during recession. Tenure reduces the probability of occupational mobility over the whole business cycle. Originality/value -The paper contributes to the literature by providing new results about the role of different factors of occupational mobility over the business cycle. This is among the few studies addressing the variation in the occupational mobility of employees from the public and private sectors. Interactions between the position of the employees in the occupational hierarchy and the ownership form of their employers and the economic sectors add to the understanding about the mechanism of occupational mobility over the business cycle stages.

Added worker effect during the Great Recession: evidence from Italy

“…22. This is not in contrast with the results obtained in Ghignoni and Verashchagina (2014) who, using a different approach, found significant AWE only for low-educated women in the South of Italy, characterised by the lowest participation rate. It is also supportive to the findings by Roosaar et al (2014) who claim that occupational mobility is lower during the recession stage.…”

Dealing with a changing work environment: hospital job type contingencies

“…Research in economics has also shown that it is easier for employees to have a career when they have completed higher education (Becker, 1993in: Roosaar et al, 2014Hennekam, 2015). The conventional economic view is that education boosts an individual's productivity and therefore increases his market value (Arrow, 1973, p. 193).…”

Labor migration and overeducation among young college graduates

“…Venhorst et al (2011) find that job migration of Dutch university graduates is less common during boom periods than during recessionary 1 3 periods. Moreover, Roosaar et al (2014) investigate occupational mobility and its determinants among Estonian workers over the business cycle. They find that demographic characteristics influence job mobility between 2001 and 2003, a period of recovery from a recession.…”