2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-011-9843-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational exposure to metal compounds and lung cancer. Results from a multi-center case–control study in Central/Eastern Europe and UK

Abstract: Occupational exposure to metals is an important risk factor for lung cancer. Although the strongest risk was observed for arsenic, exposure to chromium dust was most important in terms of attributable risk due to its high prevalence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas occupational exposure is well-described risk factor for arsenic and cadmium exposure; there was no found a relation between occupational history and metal levels of cases in this study, this result may be related with any cases had occupational history including arsenic and/or cadmium poisoning (23).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Whereas occupational exposure is well-described risk factor for arsenic and cadmium exposure; there was no found a relation between occupational history and metal levels of cases in this study, this result may be related with any cases had occupational history including arsenic and/or cadmium poisoning (23).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Another way of obtaining better agreement could be to use 10–15 benchmarks in terms of occupational titles representing specific job groups, which the experts consensus rated before the remaining rating process. In this way the experts could calibrate their estimates to a common scale [17,28,45]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These elements often include toxic heavy metals, especially arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb) (Mu et al, 2012;Passant et al, 2002). The carcinogenic potential of these heavy metals has been widely Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envres studied in humans and experimental animals ('t Mannetje et al, 2011;Boffetta et al, 2011;Huang et al, 2004;Joseph, 2009;O'Brien et al, 2003;Oller, 2002;Verougstraete et al, 2003). The unifying factor in determining toxicity and carcinogenicity for all these metals is the generation of free radicals and oxidative stress, which can then cause oxidative damage to DNA and enhanced lipid peroxidation (Jeng et al, 2011;Valko et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%