2021
DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Contact Dermatitis in Hospital Cleaning Workers

Abstract: Background: Health care workers and hospital cleaning workers are at high risk regarding the development of occupational contact dermatitis (OCD).Objectives: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of OCD in hospital cleaning workers. Methods: A questionnaire was conducted in 245 cleaning workers in our cross-sectional study. The 236 cleaning workers formed the study group. In workers who were prediagnosed with dermatitis, physical examination was performed in the Dermatology Outpatient Clinic, and when n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding was lower compared with previous studies in Poland (59%)44 and the UK (86%) 45. Our result was, however, higher than studies conducted in Turkey (21.6%),46 Germany (30%),47 Indonesia (10.6%)27 and New Zealand (14.8%) 48. This variation could be explained by differences in study period, measurement tool used (testing vs self-report), the study population’s knowledge differences about the variable of interest, the labour inspection system, the skin protection supply at work, exposure to materials (products) used for cleaning purposes and disinfectants and existing health systems in different countries regarding WRCD prevention and control among cleaners in healthcare facilities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Our finding was lower compared with previous studies in Poland (59%)44 and the UK (86%) 45. Our result was, however, higher than studies conducted in Turkey (21.6%),46 Germany (30%),47 Indonesia (10.6%)27 and New Zealand (14.8%) 48. This variation could be explained by differences in study period, measurement tool used (testing vs self-report), the study population’s knowledge differences about the variable of interest, the labour inspection system, the skin protection supply at work, exposure to materials (products) used for cleaning purposes and disinfectants and existing health systems in different countries regarding WRCD prevention and control among cleaners in healthcare facilities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Appropriate skin care behaviour does not only prevent HE, but is also a core part of HE management in secondary and tertiary prevention 1 . Work‐related HE is frequently reported in hospital cleaners as they are massively exposed not only to wet work, but also to a range of potential irritants and allergens, that comply with the hygiene requirements of the particular task 14–17 . In Denmark and internationally, hospital cleaners are only provided with information and education in hand hygiene (hand‐washing) and not in skin protection 18–21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Work-related HE is frequently reported in hospital cleaners as they are massively exposed not only to wet work, but also to a range of potential irritants and allergens, that comply with the hygiene requirements of the particular task. [14][15][16][17] In Denmark and internationally, hospital cleaners are only provided with information and education in hand hygiene (hand-washing) and not in skin protection. [18][19][20][21] Hand hygiene is important to prevent infections in hospitals, and it differs from evidence based skin care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be considered to be the cause of some respiratory (asthma, vaginitis), skin (dermatitis), fertility, and cardiovascular disorders [ 5 , 8 ]. According to some studies, exposure to these chemical substances has caused hospital cleaning workers to suffer from occupational diseases such as occupational asthma and occupational contact dermatitis [ 9 – 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%