Occupational choice and the private equity premium puzzle

Abstract

This paper suggests a resolution to what has come to be known as the 'private equity premium puzzle' (Am. Econom. Rev. 92(4) (2002) 745-778). We interpret occupational choice as a dynamic portfolio choice problem of a life-cycle investor facing a borrowing constraint, stock market participation costs and imperfect information about the profitability of potential businesses. Information is imperfect, because only entrepreneurs observe their own business risk realizations and there is a fixed cost of starting a business. Using numerical techniques we find that the model generates the empirically observed return structure for private and public equity with standard CRRA-preferences and fully rational expectations. r 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: G11; D91

Individual Determinants of Self‐employment Entry: What Do We Really Know?

“…In turn, some other important arguments identify a negative influence of age on self-employment entry above a given threshold. These include: higher risk aversion levels, lower physical and mental availability for long work weeks, stress situations that are usually associated with self-employment activities, and less time to recover the initial investment made at the entry (Hintermaier and Steinberger, 2005).…”

Wybrane determinanty przedsiębiorczości indywidualnej – zarys stanu badań

“…Występują także czynniki negatywnie wpływające na prawdopodobieństwo samozatrudnienia wśród osób starszych. Są to: malejąca z wiekiem gotowość do podejmowania ryzyka, słabsza kondycja fizyczna i psychiczna, mniejsza odporność na stres oraz relatywnie krótszy czas na odzyskanie kapitału zainwestowanego w rozpoczęcie własnej działalności (Hintermaier, Steinberger, 2005).…”

Self-Employed but Looking: A Labor Market Experiment

“…The missing piece, it has been suggested, is the option value of entrepreneurship: it is always possible to quit and (re-)enter employment if the venture is unsuccessful (Polkovnichenko, 2003). If future earnings potential is not at risk, then it makes good sense to test the waters and start a business that could yield large rewards (see also Hintermaier and Steinberger, 2005).…”