2017
DOI: 10.1590/2238-38752017v717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OCCUPATIONAL AND INCOME INTERGENERATIONAL MOBILITY IN BRAZIL BETWEEN THE 1990s AND 2000s

Abstract: This article presents the historical trends in intergenerational income mobility in Brazil between the 1990s and 2000s, based on an analysis of two age cohorts. The findings indicate a significant increase in social mobility. A second objective is to compare economic and sociological approaches to intergenerational mobility, utilizing trends in income mobility and occupational status mobility for this purpose. While the former rose substantially, the latter increased much more modestly. Finally, the article an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These articles deal with intergenerational mobility in the United States, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. We also reviewed articles from Australia (Leigh 2007;Murray et al 2017), Brazil (Dunn 2007;Ribeiro 2017), China (Yuan 2015), South Africa (Finn, Leibbrandt, and Ranchhod 2016), and Vietnam (Lam and Cuong 2017). However, these studies were not included in our models because they did not provide enough estimates of intergenerational mobility over time for each of these countries and/or did not have enough information to generate the methodological control variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These articles deal with intergenerational mobility in the United States, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. We also reviewed articles from Australia (Leigh 2007;Murray et al 2017), Brazil (Dunn 2007;Ribeiro 2017), China (Yuan 2015), South Africa (Finn, Leibbrandt, and Ranchhod 2016), and Vietnam (Lam and Cuong 2017). However, these studies were not included in our models because they did not provide enough estimates of intergenerational mobility over time for each of these countries and/or did not have enough information to generate the methodological control variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These papers deal with intergenerational mobility in the United States, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. We also reviewed papers from Australia , Murray, Clark, Mendolia and Siminski, 2017), Brazil (Dunn, 2007, Ribeiro, 2017, China (Yuan, 2015), South Africa (Finn, Leibbrandt and Ranchhod, 2016), and Vietnam (Lam and Cuong, 2017). However, these studies were not included in our models, because they did not provide enough estimates of intergenerational mobility over time for each of these countries and/or they did not have enough information to generate the methodological control variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta tendência geral de diminuição da desigualdade de oportunidades conviveu com um aumento das vantagens diretas de classe nas décadas de 1990 e 2000 (Torche e Ribeiro, 2010;Ribeiro, 2012). A mobilidade intergeracional estaria aumentando no Brasil em todos os indicadores considerados, ou seja, em termos de classe social, status ocupacional, proxy de "renda permanente" e educação (Ribeiro, 2017a). O contraste entre profissionais e trabalhadores manuais dá uma ideia concreta da magnitude do processo.…”
Section: Campo De Estudos De Mobilidade Social No Brasilunclassified