2003
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupation and smoking as risk factors for lung cancer: A population‐based case‐control study

Abstract: The high risks observed indicate a public health problem and indicate that joint exposure to risk professions and tobacco ought to be avoided. We must stress from these results the need for effective education for all workers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MG computed from both markers was used as a decision parameter. Results shown in table 1 suggest that the population with suspicious automated sputum cytology results were characterised by higher inhalation of tobacco, simultaneously occupational exposure to harmful agents and more complaints of a chronic cough; all of which are in accordance with the results of epidemiological studies assessing risk factors in lung cancer [16,24]. This may well indicate that those individuals with positive cytometric results may be considered as a particularly high-risk population for the development of lung cancer in heavy smokers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…MG computed from both markers was used as a decision parameter. Results shown in table 1 suggest that the population with suspicious automated sputum cytology results were characterised by higher inhalation of tobacco, simultaneously occupational exposure to harmful agents and more complaints of a chronic cough; all of which are in accordance with the results of epidemiological studies assessing risk factors in lung cancer [16,24]. This may well indicate that those individuals with positive cytometric results may be considered as a particularly high-risk population for the development of lung cancer in heavy smokers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…50 The influence of occupation and lung cancer mortality risk varies considerably as a function of the duration and intensity of carcinogen exposure. 51,52 Occupational exposure assessment using detailed interviews enables the construction of a job-exposure matrix. This approach generally leads to stronger associations between highrisk occupations and lung cancer risk than when job title is used as a surrogate for job exposure as was the case in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each subject was also classified according to whether or not he or she had worked in occupations at risk for lung cancer following the classification proposed by Ahrens and Merletti 15 which has been used elsewhere. 16 Subjects were considered to have been occupationally exposed if they had worked for more than 1 year in one of the occupations at risk for lung cancer.…”
Section: Design Subjects and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%