OC-0048: Library of plans for VMAT irradiation of cervical cancer: First clinical experience

Kager, P.M.; Koetsveld, F.; Bloemers, M.; Remeijer, P.

doi:10.1016/s0167-8140(15)30153-5

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For predictable ACs, adaptive strategies can be very helpful to reduce the impact of ACs, e.g. prostate adaptive radiotherapy (ART) and Library of Plan (LoP) strategies for cervix and bladder cancer patients [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] . But for unexpected ACs a decision support protocol could help to determine whether for example unscheduled plan adaptation is required.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Take Action Protocol: A radiation therapist led approach to act on anatomical changes seen on CBCT

Buijs

Pos

Frantzen-Steneker

et al. 2021

Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncolo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Until recently Traffic Light Protocols (TLP) have been developed to recognize and react to Anatomical Changes (ACs) seen on Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) scans for the most common treatment sites. This involves alerting the Radiation Oncologist (RO), handing over findings, and RO providing the final decision, making it quite labour-intensive for the ROs as well as the Radiation Therapists (RTTs). A new approach was developed to act on ACs: the Take Action Protocol (TAP). In this protocol the RTTs do not only have a role in detecting ACs, but also decide on the appropriate action and follow up, resulting in a significant shift in responsibility. In this study we present the TAP and evaluated the benefit and outcomes of the implementation of TAP compared to the TLP. During a pilot period of six months the TAP was applied for 34 bladder and prostate patients. In 2 bladder and 6 prostate patients further decision making by an RO was required (compared to all 34 in the TLP), showing a large reduction in workload. ACs were accurately assessed by RTTs in >99% of the cases. In 5/34 patients RTTs specialized in Image Guided Radiotherapy provided additional instructions to improve accurate use of the TAP. Two surveys conducted by both ROs and RTTs on the TLP and TAP showed that the perceived involvement of the ROs and burden of responsibility for RTTs was comparable between the two protocols. The identification of patients with truly clinical relevant ACs and the adaptation of treatment for the remaining fractions improved according to ROs and RTTs responses. The TAP provides a better balance between workload and efficiency in relation to the clinical relevance of acting on ACs.

show abstract