2006 American Control Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2006.1657394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obtaining stabilizing stationary controls via finite horizon cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in the companion paper [8] we show that if f and c are Lipschitz in their arguments and if the control is nonsingular in the sense that there exists ξ such that c t (z, u) ≥ ξd(u), then we can set u ≡ 0 in those concepts with no loss of generality.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, in the companion paper [8] we show that if f and c are Lipschitz in their arguments and if the control is nonsingular in the sense that there exists ξ such that c t (z, u) ≥ ξd(u), then we can set u ≡ 0 in those concepts with no loss of generality.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[5] and [9]. Here, due to the rather general setup we deal with, we need to consider the following closed loop version [8], [6] and [7].…”
Section: The Controlled System and A Sufficient Condition For Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also study how those bounds can be extended to the conditional second moments of the system. In the literature, the bounds for the cost C T are connected to basic conditions in different contexts such as conditions for existence of stabilizing receding horizon controls [9,10] or uniform cost convergence [11,12], among others. Note that even in the context of MJLS with complete state observation and general Markov chain there is no available result parallelling the ones obtained here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%