2021
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10050562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obtaining Specific Sequence Tags for Yersinia pestis and Visually Detecting Them Using the CRISPR-Cas12a System

Abstract: Three worldwide historical plague pandemics resulted in millions of deaths. Yersinia pestis, the etiologic agent of plague, is also a potential bioterrorist weapon. Simple, rapid, and specific detection of Y. pestis is important to prevent and control plague. However, the high similarity between Y. pestis and its sister species within the same genus makes detection work problematic. Here, the genome sequence from the Y. pestis CO92 strain was electronically separated into millions of fragments. These fragments… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, we have developed rapid, ultrasensitive, and specific detection methods for F. tularensis using RT-RPA and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a assays. Compared with other equally sensitive test assays already reported ( Table 2 ) (Versage et al, 2003 ; Chen et al, 2021 ; Li et al, 2021 ; Lee and Oh, 2022 ), the RPA/CRISPR-based detection of F. tularensis in this study offers a number of advantages, namely, rapid, ultrasensitive, specific, portative, and mild; more importantly, the dually diagnostic methods for F. tularensis can avoid error and missed detection to a greater extent. If it is combined with the nucleic acid-free extraction method, this detection method has a great potential value in clinical rapid diagnosis and biosafety maintenance, especially for on-site diagnosis in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In summary, we have developed rapid, ultrasensitive, and specific detection methods for F. tularensis using RT-RPA and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a assays. Compared with other equally sensitive test assays already reported ( Table 2 ) (Versage et al, 2003 ; Chen et al, 2021 ; Li et al, 2021 ; Lee and Oh, 2022 ), the RPA/CRISPR-based detection of F. tularensis in this study offers a number of advantages, namely, rapid, ultrasensitive, specific, portative, and mild; more importantly, the dually diagnostic methods for F. tularensis can avoid error and missed detection to a greater extent. If it is combined with the nucleic acid-free extraction method, this detection method has a great potential value in clinical rapid diagnosis and biosafety maintenance, especially for on-site diagnosis in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Meanwhile, most of the studies reported the LoD in CFU/mL, of which seven studies showed LoD of 1 CFU/mL. Five studies reported the LoD in molarity [ 12 , 17 , 18 , 28 , 38 , 39 ]. Of these, CAS-EXPAR for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes showed the lowest LoD up to the attomolar level [ 38 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%