2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstetric outcomes in women with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database 2003–2011✰

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further multivariate analyses confirmed the association with hypertensive disorder and SGA. These findings are in line with several previous studies in patients with RA that showed similar pregnancy outcomes 6,7,8 .…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further multivariate analyses confirmed the association with hypertensive disorder and SGA. These findings are in line with several previous studies in patients with RA that showed similar pregnancy outcomes 6,7,8 .…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Accordingly, many female patients with IA are in their childbearing years and the interplay between the inflammatory arthritic disease and pregnancy is a matter of concern. To date, most of the information in this field derives from studies conducted in patients with RA, and unfortunately the gestational data regarding those who have other types of IA are scarce 6,7,8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las madres gestantes portadoras de AR tienen un mayor riesgo de eclampsia, parto por cesárea y parto prematuro 17 . un estudio sueco en mujeres embarazadas con artritis idiopática juvenil (AIJ) presentó un mayor riesgo de complicaciones maternas e infantiles en comparación con los controles de la población 18 .…”
Section: Valor De La Ecografía En La Artritis Reumatoide Activa Durante El Embarazounclassified
“…Several studies did not include ICD‐9 code 649.1x to define obesity, which indicates complications of pregnancy attributed to obesity and was the most commonly used code in our data; this likely resulted in even greater bias as the specificity of their codes would have been even lower than what we found. Other studies have indicated that ICD‐9 codes were used to define obesity but did not list the specific codes used, making it impossible to know how biased their definition was . Regardless, the low sensitivity of ICD‐9 codes for identifying pregnant individuals with obesity suggests substantial misclassification.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%