2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and treatment response

Abstract: Recently, a role for a functional polymorphism within the promoter region of the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR) in conferring susceptibility to Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) has been suggested. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that allelic variation of the 5-HTTLPR could be associated with OCD susceptibility or influence the drug response in OCD. One hundred and eighty-one OCD patients were recruited; 92 patients underwent a standardized treatment with fluvoxamine. No significant d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…113,114 In addition, based on the efficacy of SRIs in OCD, polymorphisms in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter have been studied in OCD pedigrees. 18,177,178 However, no differences in SRI responses were found among the different genotypes studied. 178 In sum, the data on phenotypic features and knowledge of candidate genes that could predict treatment response in OCD are still very preliminary and represent additional evidence that a better definition of the OCD phenotype is needed.…”
Section: Treatment Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…113,114 In addition, based on the efficacy of SRIs in OCD, polymorphisms in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter have been studied in OCD pedigrees. 18,177,178 However, no differences in SRI responses were found among the different genotypes studied. 178 In sum, the data on phenotypic features and knowledge of candidate genes that could predict treatment response in OCD are still very preliminary and represent additional evidence that a better definition of the OCD phenotype is needed.…”
Section: Treatment Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…18,177,178 However, no differences in SRI responses were found among the different genotypes studied. 178 In sum, the data on phenotypic features and knowledge of candidate genes that could predict treatment response in OCD are still very preliminary and represent additional evidence that a better definition of the OCD phenotype is needed. Future studies attempting to identify the pharmacogenetic targets that mediate antiobsessive effects on key neuronal functions may provide a theoretical foundation for important changes in the antiobsessive paradigm (today modeled based on specific actions of antidepressants).…”
Section: Treatment Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In both studies, antidepressant response was stronger and faster among l/l homozygotes compared to heterozygotes and s/s homozygotes. On the contrary, Billett et al (1997) failed to find a relationship between the antiobsessive efficacy and 5-HTTLPR variants while Di Bella et al (2002) found a relationship only in some OCD subtypes. This discordance could be the expression of different biochemical pathways probably subtending or conditioning the efficacy of SSRIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…An example of an interesting gene is SLC6A4, an integral membrane protein that transports the neurotransmitter serotonin 30 and is a target of many psychomotor stimulants such as amphetamines and cocaine. Variation in this gene is responsible for a wide range of neurological pathogenic conditions such as aggressive behaviour 31 , obsessive-compulsive disorder 32 , depression and autism 33,34 . The most striking aspect is compulsive disorders, of which the two species share many similar phenotypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%