Observing The Differences in Constitutional Court Decision About the Legal Age of Marriage

Abstract

In 2014–2017, there were two tests of the same norms in the Marriage Law, namely the Constitutional Court Decision Number 74 / PUU-XII / 2014 and 22 / PUU-XV / 2017. However, there is a difference in the verdict between one judgment and the next. In Constitutional Court Decision Number 22/PUU-XV/2017, the Constitutional Court changed the previous stance that stated that the age limit norm was constitutional, changing it to unconstitutional, which led to the follow-up of the lawmakers to revise the Marriage Law. This study will compare judges' considerations in the decisions of Constitutional Court Number 74 / PUU-XII / 2014 and Number 22 / PUU-XV / 2017. It will be sought against the Constitutional Court's background changing its stance from one ruling to the next. This research uses normative research methods with a conceptual and philosophical approach to legislation. The results showed that the difference underlying the two rulings was in the excavation of legal sources by judges in their legal considerations.

Hubungan Negara Dan Agama: Telaah Hukum Dan Putusan Pengadilan

“…Agama mulai masuk ke dalam sendi kehidupan-pada era Orde Baru nilai agama (Islam) menjadi sumber dibentuknya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. 11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1. 58 Tahun 1998 Indonesia memasuki babak baru kenegaraan yang ditandai dengan 2 peristiwa ketatanegaraan: Turunnya Presiden Soeharto diikuti dengan tutupnya rezim otoriter orde baru-yang oleh Dwight King disebut bureucratic authoritarian regime; 12 dan dilanjutkan dengan reformasi konstitusi sebagai semangat perubahan penyelengaraan negara yang lebih demokratis.…”