2004
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observing and engaging in purposeful actions with objects influences estimates of their size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
64
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
13
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in the throwing-only tasks, where the circle-shaped target was the primary action-related object, children who hit the target more often perceived the target to be bigger than did children who hit the target less successfully. This provides clear support for the perceptual accentuation hypothesis (see Veltkamp et al, 2008) and is in accordance with previous findings by Witt and colleagues ; see also Wesp, Cichello, Gracia, & Davis, 2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, in the throwing-only tasks, where the circle-shaped target was the primary action-related object, children who hit the target more often perceived the target to be bigger than did children who hit the target less successfully. This provides clear support for the perceptual accentuation hypothesis (see Veltkamp et al, 2008) and is in accordance with previous findings by Witt and colleagues ; see also Wesp, Cichello, Gracia, & Davis, 2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Recent evidence has demonstrated action-specific influences on perception of the environment (Wesp et al, 2004;. Successful performance systematically affects the perceived size or distance of action-related objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other evidence that performance can influence perception comes from another laboratory task in which participants had to drop a miniature dart onto a target. Participants who required fewer drops to hit the target perceived the target to be bigger (Wesp et al 2004). Because participants viewed the target while making their estimates as well, these findings support the notion that performance influences perception, rather than memory.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In the current experiment, participants viewed the target throughout the experiment and while making both pre-and post-performance size estimates. Therefore, the current results suggest an effect on perception rather than memory (see also Wesp et al 2004;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Softball players with a better batting average perceived a softball to appear larger , golfers who were better putters reported that the target hole appeared bigger (Witt, Linkenauger, Bakdash, & Proffitt, 2008), participants with better performance in throwing darts perceived the target to be larger (Cañal-Bruland & van der Kamp, 2009;Cañal-Bruland, Pijpers, & Oudejans, 2010;Wesp, Cichello, Gracia, & Davis, 2004), and field goal kickers with better performance perceived the distance between the goal posts to be larger (Witt & Dorsch, 2009). Here, the notion is that the relevant perceptual ruler is the variability distribution of performance around a particular target.…”
Section: Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%