1990
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.43.4.320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer reproducibility in grading dysplasia in colorectal adenomas: comparison between two different grading systems.

Abstract: The two most well known and well defined grading systems for dysplasia in colorectal adenomas were

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The different importance assigned to nuclear dysplastic abnormalities (nuclear stratification, in particular) may explain the significantly different detection levels observed in this study between the two centres (40/457 and 54/457 cases versus 99/457 and 101/457 cases for optical and virtual microscopy, respectively). As previously demonstrated, when dysplasia grading is determined by architectural criteria, based on large areas, high grade is more easily and frequently identifiable at a lower magnification 14. Conversely, focusing on nuclear abnormalities in smaller areas and even barely identifiable epithelial tracts can fulfil the criteria for high-grade dysplasia, lowering the detection rate 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The different importance assigned to nuclear dysplastic abnormalities (nuclear stratification, in particular) may explain the significantly different detection levels observed in this study between the two centres (40/457 and 54/457 cases versus 99/457 and 101/457 cases for optical and virtual microscopy, respectively). As previously demonstrated, when dysplasia grading is determined by architectural criteria, based on large areas, high grade is more easily and frequently identifiable at a lower magnification 14. Conversely, focusing on nuclear abnormalities in smaller areas and even barely identifiable epithelial tracts can fulfil the criteria for high-grade dysplasia, lowering the detection rate 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…T h e remaining tissue was used for histopathologic examination. Classification and grading of the adenomas were performed according to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations (Morson and Sobin, 1976), a system which, in our hands, has shown good reproducibility (Fenger et al, 1990). There were 11 tubular, 5 tubulovillous, and 1 villous adenoma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…85,86 The kappa values between two pathologists ranged from 0.59 to 0.69 in tumour pathological diagnosis. [87][88][89] OS is able to permit non-invasive and objective analysis of biochemical and subcellular alterations of tissues, and the results are well correlated with histopathology. In the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus (BE), a high level of agreement (kappa value 0.89) was observed between spectral data and consensus opinion of pathology.…”
Section: Os Diagnosis Based On Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%