2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer-based state estimation for memristive neural networks with time-varying delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where (20) cannot hold when h y is large enough. Therefore, there exists an upper bound h * for h y such that (20) holds when h y ∈ [0, h * ], and (18).…”
Section: Single Observermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where (20) cannot hold when h y is large enough. Therefore, there exists an upper bound h * for h y such that (20) holds when h y ∈ [0, h * ], and (18).…”
Section: Single Observermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of state estimation for RNNs is currently of great interest to many scholars, and many significant results have been made [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In [13], the authors discussed the state estimation problem for delayed RNNs and obtained delay-independent results using LMI technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As everyone knows, time delays can not omitted in the realization of NNs because of the communication time among neurons, and further, their existence will result in performance degradation of NNs, even instability. Motivated this idea, the problem of testing stability of delayed NNs has received more attention, and stability conditions for BAMNNs with various delays were developed to assure the asymptotic or exponential stability [7]- [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%