2018
DOI: 10.1080/15230430.2018.1433789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observed sediment and solute transport from the Kangerlussuaq sector of the Greenland Ice Sheet (2006–2016)

Abstract: New measurements of Watson River sediment and solute concentrations and an extended river discharge record improved by acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) measurements are used to calculate the total sediment and solute transport from a large ice-sheet sector in southern west Greenland. For the 2006-2016 period, the mean annual sediment and solute transport was 17.5 ± 7.2 × 10 6 t and 85 ± 30 × 10 3 t, respectively (standard deviation given). The highest annual transport occurred in 2010, attaining values… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates the need for a careful and consistent approach to defining the effective drainage basin area in glacial erosion studies for major outlet glaciers. Modern glacial erosion rates have also been provided for the well-studied Kangerlussuaq area in central west Greenland, by measuring annual sediment loads (suspended and in solution) in proglacial rivers beyond land-terminating glaciers (Cowton et al, 2012;Hawkings et al, 2015;Hasholt et al, 2018) and dividing by the catchment area. Although individual study years have returned rates as high as 4.5 mm a −1 , for the decade 2006-2016 the average rate was 0.5 mm a −1 (Hasholt et al, 2018).…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Fjord Systems: Glacial Erosion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This indicates the need for a careful and consistent approach to defining the effective drainage basin area in glacial erosion studies for major outlet glaciers. Modern glacial erosion rates have also been provided for the well-studied Kangerlussuaq area in central west Greenland, by measuring annual sediment loads (suspended and in solution) in proglacial rivers beyond land-terminating glaciers (Cowton et al, 2012;Hawkings et al, 2015;Hasholt et al, 2018) and dividing by the catchment area. Although individual study years have returned rates as high as 4.5 mm a −1 , for the decade 2006-2016 the average rate was 0.5 mm a −1 (Hasholt et al, 2018).…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Fjord Systems: Glacial Erosion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern glacial erosion rates have also been provided for the well-studied Kangerlussuaq area in central west Greenland, by measuring annual sediment loads (suspended and in solution) in proglacial rivers beyond land-terminating glaciers (Cowton et al, 2012;Hawkings et al, 2015;Hasholt et al, 2018) and dividing by the catchment area. Although individual study years have returned rates as high as 4.5 mm a −1 , for the decade 2006-2016 the average rate was 0.5 mm a −1 (Hasholt et al, 2018). These studies used a consistent approach to defining the catchment area based on the ablation area for the Kangerlussuaq drainage basin and modelled hydrological catchment, which we deem as comparable to the approach taken here (i.e.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Fjord Systems: Glacial Erosion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modern glacial erosion rates have also been provided for the well-studied Kangerlussuaq area in central West Greenland, by measuring annual sediment loads (suspended and in solution) in proglacial rivers beyond land-terminating glaciers (Cowton et al, 2012;Hawkings et al, 2015;Hasholt et al, 2018) and dividing by the catchment area. Although individual study years have returned rates as high as 4.5 mm a -1 , for the decade 2006-2016 the average rate was 0.5 mm a -1 (Hasholt et al, 2018).…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Fjord Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nearby presence of the GrIS has a dominant influence as a source for sediment and nutrients to foreland and fjord systems, and both field observations and modeling of the GrIS are important to elucidate the magnitude and change of these fluxes. Based on runoff monitoring and sample collection at the outlet of Watson River,Hasholt et al (2018) quantified the export of sediment and solutes into the fjord. Van As et al (2018) used air temperature data from Kangerlussuaq and runoff data from lake Tasersiaq, located south of the Kangerlussuaq area, to extrapolate the Watson River runoff time series back to 1949.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%