2020
DOI: 10.5194/tc-14-261-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glacial sedimentation, fluxes and erosion rates associated with ice retreat in Petermann Fjord and Nares Strait, north-west Greenland

Abstract: Abstract. Petermann Fjord is a deep (>1000 m) fjord that incises the coastline of north-west Greenland and was carved by an expanded Petermann Glacier, one of the six largest outlet glaciers draining the modern Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS). Between 5 and 70 m of unconsolidated glacigenic material infills in the fjord and adjacent Nares Strait, deposited as the Petermann and Nares Strait ice streams retreated through the area after the Last Glacial Maximum. We have investigated the deglacial deposits using sei… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Petermann ice tongue has historically covered most of the Petermann Fjord, extending about 80 km from the grounding zone, but large calving events in 2010 and 2012 reduced it to its current length (Münchow, Padman, and Fricker 2014), opening the fjord to research from icebreaker Oden. The seafloor of the area is bathymetrically complex, with several basins formed by underlying bedrock topography and molded by confluent ice streams during previous glaciations (Jakobsson et al 2018;Hogan et al 2020;Figure 1b).…”
Section: Environmental Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Petermann ice tongue has historically covered most of the Petermann Fjord, extending about 80 km from the grounding zone, but large calving events in 2010 and 2012 reduced it to its current length (Münchow, Padman, and Fricker 2014), opening the fjord to research from icebreaker Oden. The seafloor of the area is bathymetrically complex, with several basins formed by underlying bedrock topography and molded by confluent ice streams during previous glaciations (Jakobsson et al 2018;Hogan et al 2020;Figure 1b).…”
Section: Environmental Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we targeted bedrock locations that exhibited evidence of subglacial abrasion (i.e., striations, polish), rather than quarrying (Figure 2), we consider our erosional depths to represent abrasion depths. While it is likely that samples in erosional Group 1 represent abrasion, no sample plots between Groups 1 and 2 on Figure 1, and the apparent abrasion rates (erosion depths corrected for the duration of historical cover) implied by the erosional depths of Groups 2 (1.63 ± 0.56 mm yr -1 ) and 3 (6.24 ± 0.56 mm yr -1 ) exceed most estimates of subglacial erosion (which include both abrasion and quarrying) in Greenland (Hogan et al, 2020 and references therein) and as well as many estimates from the midlatitudes and polar regions (Cook et al, 2020; Figure 5). Thus, we find it unlikely that the Group 2 and 3 10 Be concentrations were solely achieved by rock abrasion.…”
Section: Centennial-scale Erosionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In east Greenland, sediment flux data yield a canonical Greenland erosion rate of 0.01-0.04 mm yr -1 (Andrews et al, 1994), which Cowton et al (2012) revised to 0.3 mm yr -1 after accounting for sediment entrained in iceberg mélange after Syvitski et al (1996). Suspended sediment and solute data from the Watson proglacial river near Kangerlussuaq in central-west Greenland constrain average subglacial erosion to 0.5 mm yr -1 for the years 2006-2016 (Hasholt et al, 2018), although individual years were perhaps as high as 4.5 mm yr -1 (Hogan et al, 2020). Furthermore, suspended sediment load from an individual glacier within the Watson River catchment yielded a higher erosion rate of 4.8 ± 2.6 mm yr -1 from 2009-2010 (Cowton et al, 2012).…”
Section: Modeled Orbital-and Centennial-scale Erosion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This basement surface could either be sedimentary bedrock, or highly lithified sedimentary units like till. Hogan et al (2020) illustrated that in Petermann Fjord, lower frequency air gun seismic data was required to differentiate bedrock from more lithified sediments and till. The unsplit sediment cores were allowed to equilibrate to room temperature (~20 o C) and logged shipboard on a Geotek multi-sensor core logger (MSCL).…”
Section: Marine Sediment Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%