2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-011-9481-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observed Externalizing Behavior: A Developmental Comparison of Genetic and Environmental Influences Across Three Samples

Abstract: Estimates of genetic and environmental influences on externalizing behavior are markedly inconsistent. In an attempt to refine and extend our knowledge of externalizing behavior, the current study examined the etiology of externalizing behavior using observational data in middle childhood and adolescence from three twin and sibling samples. Observational ratings offer a unique perspective on externalizing behavior rarely examined within behavioral genetic designs. Shared environmental influences were significa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The exogenous dimension of depression as shown by the study and externalizing problems (i.e., drop in school performance, school work difficulty, disobedience, fighting, misbehavior) was less heritable and showed significant shared environmental etiologies. The small heritable component in this dimension may reflect genetic influences on externalizing behaviors that were also influenced by shared environmental factors (Marceau et al., ; Moffitt, ). Interestingly, the anhedonia dimension, which was supposed to be an endophenotype of depression, was subject to minimal genetic influence but substantial environmental influences in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exogenous dimension of depression as shown by the study and externalizing problems (i.e., drop in school performance, school work difficulty, disobedience, fighting, misbehavior) was less heritable and showed significant shared environmental etiologies. The small heritable component in this dimension may reflect genetic influences on externalizing behaviors that were also influenced by shared environmental factors (Marceau et al., ; Moffitt, ). Interestingly, the anhedonia dimension, which was supposed to be an endophenotype of depression, was subject to minimal genetic influence but substantial environmental influences in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, we make use of several measurement strategies: parent- and child-informant reports, videotaped parent–child, family, and spousal interactions, and the assessment of an independent sample of neighborhood informants from each twin family’s neighborhood. The TBED-C has already produced several published papers (Burt & Klump, 2012, in press-a; Burt et al, 2012; Humbad et al, 2011; Klahr et al, in press; Marceau et al, 2012; Nikolas et al, 2012, in press), with many more under review and in preparation.…”
Section: Msutr Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observational as well as survey methods comprise our assessments of parent–child, familial, and spousal relationships. This multi-method approach allows us to more rigorously define our phenotype (Burt, 2012; Burt & Klump, 2012), examine informant effects on heritability estimates (Marceau et al, 2012; Nikolas et al, in press), and obtain a more fine-tuned understanding of environmental risks and their contributions to psychiatric outcomes (Burt et al, 2012; Burt & Klump, in press-a, 2012; Nikolas et al, 2012). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there are several twin studies examining etiological influences on observer‐ratings of acting‐out behaviors (Arsenault et al, 2003; Deater‐Deckard, 2000; Leve, Winebarger, Fagot, Reid, & Goldsmith, 1998; Marceau et al, 2010; O’Connor, Hetherington, Reiss, & Plomin, 1995; Plomin, Foch, & Rowe, 1981). Early work by Plomin et al (1981), Leve et al (1998), and Deater‐Deckard (2000) estimated shared environmental influences on observer‐ratings to be moderate to large in magnitude (25–42%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%