Laser Techniques and Applications in Fluid Mechanics 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-02885-8_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on the Near Wake of a Yawed Circular Cylinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The squares are experimental results. The near wake parts are from Lourenco et al [23] while the last four points in the far wake are from Ong et al [24] worse than the one from the B-spline scheme. The reason is that we use a second order finite difference scheme while the B-spline scheme is of higher-order.…”
Section: Turbulent Flow Around a Circular Cylinder Atmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The squares are experimental results. The near wake parts are from Lourenco et al [23] while the last four points in the far wake are from Ong et al [24] worse than the one from the B-spline scheme. The reason is that we use a second order finite difference scheme while the B-spline scheme is of higher-order.…”
Section: Turbulent Flow Around a Circular Cylinder Atmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The SGS model used in these two simulations was the dynamic Smagorinsky model. The experimental data for the vortex-formation region is from the particle image velocimetry (PIV) result of Lourenco et al [23]. The near wake result is from Ong and Wallace [24] in which the hot-wire velocimetry was used.…”
Section: Turbulent Flow Around a Circular Cylinder Atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 shows the streamwise velocity component along the vertical section located 1.06 D behind the cylinder. For lower Re (= 3900 37 ), L r is higher (1.5 D ), and the velocity minima is higher at a given x location, whereas for higher Re (= 140,000 29 ), L r and the velocity minima is lower at the same x location. In the present work, the value of Re (= 19,800) lies between 3900 and 140,000, and as a result, the velocity minima also lie in between.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, laminar, SST Kv and SKe models gave totally irrelevant results. (Wornom et al, 2011) 0.99 Experiment (Lourenco et al, 1992) 0.985 Experiment (Breuer, 1998) 1.08 Experiment (Chen and Ballengee, 1971) 0.38 0.47 Experiment (Keefe, 1962) 0.38 Experiment (Schlichting and Gersten, 1979) 0.995 1.1 For the lift coefficient, by comparing the achieved results (Table 4) with the result from Keefe (1962) which is 0.38, it found that SKv is the best turbulence model out of the tested group to predict the lift coefficient at 0.35 with 8% error while RKe came as a close second at 0.26 with 26%. On the other hand, laminar, SST kv and SKe gave totally irrelevant results.…”
Section: Numerical Model Validation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%