1983
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(83)90301-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on the chemical composition of rain using short sampling times during a single event

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kins (1982) came to the same conclusion when studying middle European rain. Studies by Seymour et al (1983) in the U.S. also support this finding. Finally, the findings of the analysis of the elemental composition of single particles based on one sample are presented.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Kins (1982) came to the same conclusion when studying middle European rain. Studies by Seymour et al (1983) in the U.S. also support this finding. Finally, the findings of the analysis of the elemental composition of single particles based on one sample are presented.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…faster,' but those authors do not indicate whether the difference between b SO 4 2− and NO 3 − derived from their data is statistically significant. Very similar scavenging efficiencies for SO 4 2− and NO 3 − (as implied by our data) is also supported by research conducted in western Michigan, USA (Seymour & Stout, 1983). The derived uncertainty in b for all the ions studied here are relatively high (Table II) in response to the stochastic nature of precipitation processes and the relatively low number of events sampled.…”
Section: Table IIsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…While each precipitation event is unique, in general theoretical considerations and previous observations have indicated significant enrichment in the initial stages of precipitation events and in light precipitation events (e.g., Asman, Jonker, Slanina, & Baard, 1982;Burch, Waldner, & Fritschi, 1996;Claassen & Halm, 1995b;Kennedy, Zellweger, & Avanzino, 1979;Khare et al, 1996;Kins, 1982;Lim, Jickells, & Davies, 1991;Mizak et al, 2005;Pryor & Barthelmie, 2005;Radojevic & Lim, 1995;Seto et al, 2002;Seymour & Stout, 1983). Data collected during five precipitation events (all summertime liquid phase events) in the northeastern USA indicate up to 50% of the total sulfate (SO 4 2− ) and nitrate (NO 3 − ) deposition can occur during the first 15%-20% of the total rainfall and that after a precipitation depth of 4.6 mm ion concentrations tend to asymptote to a constant value for the remainder of the event (Seymour & Stout, 1983). Equally, data collected during 13 thunderstorms in the Altal-valley in Switzerland showed "28% of the total load of elements and nutrients was washed out in the first 5 mm of a rain-event" (Burch et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Influence of these scavenging processes is evident in changes of concentration of the ionic components in rainwater. This decrease in constituents concentration during rain events has also been observed by other authors (Seymour and Stout, 1983;Ahmed et al, 1990;Lim et al, 1991;Báez et al, 1993), and it has been attributed to several possible effects: within cloud scavenging, dilution with cloud droplet growth, below cloud scavenging, evaporation and evaporation followed by accumulation of aerosol particle aloft and precipitation of these accumulated particles.…”
Section: Sequential Samplingsupporting
confidence: 51%