2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-013-9713-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Trends in Biomass Loss as a Result of Disturbance in the Conterminous U.S.: 1986–2004

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Forest land remaining forest land lost 184 ± 10 Tg C year −1 to disturbance (13% from natural disturbance, 87% from harvest); these were compensated by net carbon gains of 452 ± 48 Tg C year −1 , 75% of which occurred within timberland areas (Table 4). C losses from natural and human induced disturbances reduced the potential net C sink in US forests by 42% compared to the potential sink estimated without disturbance effects included, an estimate that is similar to other studies [28, 34]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Forest land remaining forest land lost 184 ± 10 Tg C year −1 to disturbance (13% from natural disturbance, 87% from harvest); these were compensated by net carbon gains of 452 ± 48 Tg C year −1 , 75% of which occurred within timberland areas (Table 4). C losses from natural and human induced disturbances reduced the potential net C sink in US forests by 42% compared to the potential sink estimated without disturbance effects included, an estimate that is similar to other studies [28, 34]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Zhou et al [36] estimate total C emissions from wood harvest in 35 eastern US states as 168 Tg C year −1 between 2002 and 2010, while our estimate for the same geographic extent is 132 ± 8 Tg C year −1 between 2006 and 2010. Other national scale estimates of emissions from wood harvest are lower, such as that of Williams et al [37] (107 Tg year −1 in 2005) and Powell et al [34] (74 Tg C year −1 between 1986 and 2004). Hicke and Zeppel [38] estimated that bark beetles and fire together resulted in gross emissions of 32 Tg C year −1 in the western US between 1997 and 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems of estimating change from RS data are well-known in the tropical forest literature (Brown, 2002, Mitchard et al 2014. An approach examining transitions among land cover categories can be effectively used to identify sites and volume of losses-as has been done recently with Landfire specifically (Zheng et al 2011, Powell et al 2014-but is less appropriate as an estimator of net change in forest carbon. For estimating net change on forested land, an inventory-based approach such as the FIA, when the data is available, is likely to be more reliable than an approach relying on category changes such as one based on Landfire.…”
Section: Improving Landscape-scale Carbon Flux Estimates For Californmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wall-to-wall lidar coverage for large areas is still costly and logistically prohibitive for many regional and NFI programs; however, 500 m resolution MODIS-based biomass linkage to climate and forest disturbance has demonstrated that forest development and climate controls were important contributors to the yearly AGB increase from 2001 to 2010 [43]. The Landsat time series (LTS) change detection methods provide pixel-level characterization of forest disturbance and recovery [44][45][46][47] and thus LTS change metrics can improve and overcome some limitations in forest structure [38] and facilitate predictions of forest AGB dynamics over time [14,48,49]. Forest disturbance data based on Vegetation Change Tracker (VCT) data can be used to integrate with AGB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%