1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.76.2428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Temporal Behavior of an Atomic Wave Packet Localized in an Optical Potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atoms can be trapped and cooled at the potential minima (mean position spread z rms =λ/18 [5]). In optical lattices symmetrically and asymmetrically oscillating motional wave packets can be induced by nonadiabatically changing the lattice potential [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Quantum mechanically, the original atomic wave function is projected onto a coherent superposition of the eigenstates of the new potential and the quantum interference of the contributions from different eigenstates results in a wave packet oscillation (see Fig.…”
Section: 80pj 4250vkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Atoms can be trapped and cooled at the potential minima (mean position spread z rms =λ/18 [5]). In optical lattices symmetrically and asymmetrically oscillating motional wave packets can be induced by nonadiabatically changing the lattice potential [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Quantum mechanically, the original atomic wave function is projected onto a coherent superposition of the eigenstates of the new potential and the quantum interference of the contributions from different eigenstates results in a wave packet oscillation (see Fig.…”
Section: 80pj 4250vkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the effect of dephasing is dominating decoherence [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], so that a direct determination of the coherence time is not possible. Here, we show how these limitations can be overcome: For the case of symmetrical oscillations, Bulatov et al [14] have recently proposed and numerically simulated an echo-mechanism to reverse the effect of dephasing and stimulate the revival of the wave packet oscillations by means of two successive non-adiabatic changes in the depth of the lattice potential.…”
Section: 80pj 4250vkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe this difference to be due to the variation from linearity of the actual time dependent potential change, although this explanation is still under investigation. This reconstruction is typical of our data and underlines the point that our fluorescence detection technique is a direct measure of R jc͑x, t͒j 2 R͑x͒dx as compared to other probes such as Bragg diffraction [21,22] or time resolved recoil induced resonance spectroscopy [4]. However, our calculations show that near resonance there is one practical restriction: if the experiment is repeated by decreasing T osc ͞2 from 3.1 to 1.4 ms, essentially no modulation of the fluorescence is predicted, and none was observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To date, such wave packets have been been observed [4] and have been used to study interesting problems in quantum chaos [5] as well as Bloch oscillations [6] and Wannier-Stark ladders [7]. In each of these experiments, the atomic wave packet motion was induced by a translation of U͑x͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groups in Japan, at NISI, in Munich and our group at Rochester [16], have also been using optical lattices to explore another interesting problem: the quantum control of center-of-mass wave packet motion in the optical lattice. In these experiments we have taken advantage of the fact that the potential wells which bind the atoms in the lattice can be manipulated rapidly and with great precision.…”
Section: Parametric Excitation Of Motional Wave Packets In An Opticalmentioning
confidence: 99%