2013
DOI: 10.1109/led.2013.2262521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Normally Distributed Energies for Interface Trap Recovery After Hot-Carrier Degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation energy dispersion is modeled using a Gaussian distribution with E a = 1.5 eV and σ E = 0.15 eV. These values are in agreement with experimental ones [17,18].…”
Section: The Modelsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The activation energy dispersion is modeled using a Gaussian distribution with E a = 1.5 eV and σ E = 0.15 eV. These values are in agreement with experimental ones [17,18].…”
Section: The Modelsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As a result, in the model we assume that E a obeys a Gaussian distribution Dominant mechanisms of HCD in short-& long-channel transistors with the mean value and the standard deviation equal to 1.5 eV and 0.15 eV correspondingly. These values are in good agreement with the experimentally observed ones [5,21]. All these ingredients are consolidated in the latest model [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The argument is that in these devices the operating/stress voltages are low, and thus carriers with energies above the threshold for triggering a single-carrier bond-breakage even of ∼1.5 eV [4,5] are unlikely. Thus, in scaled devices the only probable way to dissociate the Si-H bond is by the multiple vibrational excitation (MVE) of this bond [6][7][8], i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the activation energy fluctuations we assume that E a obeys a Gaussian distribution with the mean values and standard deviation of �E a � = 1.5 eV and σ E = 0.15 eV. These values are in good agreement with experimentally observed ones [74][75][76]. The effect of the activation energy dispersion was incorporated in the manner that the range [�E a � − 3σ E ; �E a � + 3σ E ] was discretized and for each discretization point we evaluated the interface trap density profile N it (x) according to (11) weighted with the Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: The Modelsupporting
confidence: 75%