2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of fracture and plastic deformation during indentation and scratching inside the scanning electron microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
99
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[35] It is therefore important to develop tools permitting to visualise the various scratching mechanisms taking place, with a high spatial resolution and sufficient depth focus. The nano-scratching tool presented in the experimental section and in the literature [17,18] could be used for GaAs scratching inside an SEM. In particular, the process of particle generation could be observed even for sub-micron particles.…”
Section: Crack At the Surface And Particle Generation: In-situ Scratcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35] It is therefore important to develop tools permitting to visualise the various scratching mechanisms taking place, with a high spatial resolution and sufficient depth focus. The nano-scratching tool presented in the experimental section and in the literature [17,18] could be used for GaAs scratching inside an SEM. In particular, the process of particle generation could be observed even for sub-micron particles.…”
Section: Crack At the Surface And Particle Generation: In-situ Scratcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 More recently, Rabe et al integrated a microindentation device inside a SEM. 6 The in situ SEM imaging during the microindentation test provided a real-time monitor of the true contact area, pileup, and shear band formation 7 throughout the indentation cycle. Another advantage of in situ SEM indentation is the capability to observe crack initiation and timecorrelate this event to the force-displacement curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design principles are somewhat similar to the instrument introduced elsewhere; however, there are some significant differences. 6 The main differences are the electrostatic force actuation, capacitance displacement sensing, load resolution, the imaging resolution, and two possible indentation control modes (open-loop load ramp or closed-loop displacement ramp) available as well as the size of the current design. A Hysitron PicoIndenter transducer 8 (Minneapolis, MN) provides high-sensitivity force-displacement data and a Hitachi S-4800 (Japan) SEM provides high-resolution imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004, Rabe et al introduced an in situ SEM indentation instrument. 20 This instrument is capable of recording the indentation load-depth data simultaneously. Because of using stick-slip type piezoelectric actuators which have the jump-back phenomenon, the indentation process is not steady and the jump-back also has some effect on indentation tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%