2006
DOI: 10.1179/136404606225023291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of crack initiation during hot tearing

Abstract: While the general mechanisms of hot tearing are understood, i.e. the inability of liquid to feed imposed strain on the mushy material, work continues on improving the understanding of the mechanisms at play. A hot tear test rig that measures the temperature and load imposed on the mushy zone during solidification has been successfully used to study hot tearing. The mould has now been modified to incorporate a window above the hot spot region to allow observation of hot tear formation and growth. Combining info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, M values at g s < 0.9 are insignificant, but increase sharply beginning at g s = 0.9; with increasing strain rate the rapid increase in M occurs at lower g s . As shown by many previous authors (see, for example, Davidson et al [31]), hot tearing susceptibility is significantly increased at g s > 0.9. These results confirm those findings, and indicate that it is the feeding ability of the mushy zone that determines hot tear formation.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…As can be seen, M values at g s < 0.9 are insignificant, but increase sharply beginning at g s = 0.9; with increasing strain rate the rapid increase in M occurs at lower g s . As shown by many previous authors (see, for example, Davidson et al [31]), hot tearing susceptibility is significantly increased at g s > 0.9. These results confirm those findings, and indicate that it is the feeding ability of the mushy zone that determines hot tear formation.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…The problem of the crack initiation is today solved by an educated guess, as only recently experimental observations on the crack nucleation upon natural hot tearing have started to emerge: first, for transparent analogues [16] and then for real metals. [58] Usually, the development of a hot crack is studied on samples with a notch, hence, with the artificial crack initiator. [46,64] Based on these observations and ''postmortem'' examination of hot tear surfaces, the following crack nuclei have been suggested: (1) liquid film or liquid pool; (2) pore or series of pores; (3) grain boundary located in the place of stress concentration; and (4) inclusions that can be easily separated from the surrounding liquid or solid phase, e.g., intermetallic particle or oxide film.…”
Section: Outline Of Hot Tearing Mechanisms As a Base Of A New Homentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14,15,[23][24][25] There is still no general conclusion on the fraction solid at the onset of hot tearing. Further work is needed before such a conclusion can be drawn.…”
Section: Comparison With Reported Fraction Solid At Hot Tearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A video camera was used to detect the onset of hot tearing, and with the Scheil model, the corresponding fraction solid in Al-0.5Cu was reported to be 0.93. [23] Acoustic emission was also used to detect the onset of hot tearing, and based on the evolution of the latent heat during solidification instead of the Scheil model, the fraction solid was found to be 0.71 to 0.99 in ring casting of 1050 Al. [25] The load cell has been most frequently used to detect the onset of hot tearing so far, and the corresponding fraction solid has been determined based on the Scheil model.…”
Section: Comparison With Reported Fraction Solid At Hot Tearingmentioning
confidence: 99%