1977
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.38.1077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Amplification in a Strongly Driven Two-Level Atomic System at Optical Frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
168
3
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 488 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
11
168
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1983, Wu et al [106] found the splitting in the atomic spectrum VRS by studying the strong coupling g is the coupling coefficient of atomic and cavity EM fields. κ is the attenuation coefficient of the cavity field.…”
Section: Vrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1983, Wu et al [106] found the splitting in the atomic spectrum VRS by studying the strong coupling g is the coupling coefficient of atomic and cavity EM fields. κ is the attenuation coefficient of the cavity field.…”
Section: Vrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, two out of the four possible optical transitions are energetically degenerate. Hence, the optical spectrum consists of three peaks -the famous Mollow triplet for atoms [6,7] or excitons [8,9]. In the semiconductor band case, the light-induced gap in, e.g., the conduction band arises because the original conduction band and the one-photon sideband of the valence band lead to an avoided crossing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dephasing of the off-diagonal density matrix elements we take into account that the damping is the sum of a constant contribution due to LO-phonon scattering and a term proportional to the third root of the carrier density n [16]. To account for the additional energy dependence, we use the following dephasing for the various interband polarization (p) components (n Þ m), @ @t nm ; t coll ÿ p ; t nm ; t ; (6) where is the excess energy with respect to the unrenormalized band gap and the density-and energy-dependent damping rate is given by…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This amplification of the signal current may be understood to happen primarily at the expense of the strong driving (control) current, which experiences an increased attenuation rate. A similar amplification of the probe-field profile in a strongly driven two-level atomic system at optical frequencies was predicted in [58] and experimentally observed and verified in [59].…”
Section: Experimental Parameters and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The difference in the peak widths lies in the fact that usually T 2 /T 1 = 2 in an atomic system (see equations (28) and (29) if the pure dephasing rate γ 2 = 0), whereas a typical value of T 2 /T 1 = 0.2 is chosen for the CPB qubit system. If we apply a weak probe field (signal current) and calculate the signal-current absorption power profile, we find that the signal-current absorption power profile takes on negative values (see figure 5), representing stimulated emission rather than absorption [58,59]. This amplification of the signal current may be understood to happen primarily at the expense of the strong driving (control) current, which experiences an increased attenuation rate.…”
Section: Experimental Parameters and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%