2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective measurement of motor speech characteristics in the healthy pediatric population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Because sex was not a significant predictor for any of the 8 MSP parameters, 19 we combined the data across sexes for regression analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…19 Because sex was not a significant predictor for any of the 8 MSP parameters, 19 we combined the data across sexes for regression analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MSP was used to provide a noninvasive, reproducible, and objective measure of motor speech in the present study and in the previously published normative study. 19 Children were asked to complete a set of programprescribed tasks that were then used to assess different voice and speech parameters ( Table 1): diadochokinetic (DDK) rate, second formant transitions, intonation patterns, and syllabic rates. The DDK rate was measured during repetition of singlesyllable and multisyllabic stimuli (eg, /pa/ and /pataka/).…”
Section: Outcome Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, there are only a few objective instruments for mapping children's motor speech skills and there is no norm referenced assessment based on a large data set. This is a major problem, as a good understanding of normal speech is necessary for the interpretation of MSDs [6]. Finally, the existing assessments may be hard for children to complete and it also demands a lot of the SLP's judgment ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for the existence of common perceptual mechanisms for both, come from several different lines of research, including psychoacoustic, electroencephalography, and imaging studies. Linguistic studies that have focused on syllabic rates across different languages including Greek, reveal periodicities around 3–5 Hz (200–333 ms; Baltazani, 2007; Tilsen and Johnson, 2008; Wong et al, 2011; Tilsen and Arvaniti, 2013). Studies on the acoustics of speech have found that the dominant component of the amplitude envelope is found in temporal modulations around the same frequency, i.e., in the range of 4–8 Hz (Chi et al, 1999; Chandrasekaran et al, 2009; Elliott and Theunissen, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%