2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2014.6853813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective evaluation of the audibility of transient errors in an adaptive A/D conversion channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However some of the test subjects have been able to reach into the minimum gain step size implemented in both test (0.01dB). In [6] it was claimed that for making the transient errors (glitches) to be inaudible, one can target ADB and MFPD for a specific range, which is mapped to step sizes larger than 0.01 dB step size, the reason for this claim is that in [6] the number of steps has been maintained while the step size has been reduced, although we have followed a different logic, which is reducing the step size while having more steps, therefore our results are different with [6]. Consequently we cannot use ADB and MFPD as the objective measures to make any conclusion as the glitch is audible where the ADB and MFPD are not able to evaluate the audibility.…”
Section: Subjective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However some of the test subjects have been able to reach into the minimum gain step size implemented in both test (0.01dB). In [6] it was claimed that for making the transient errors (glitches) to be inaudible, one can target ADB and MFPD for a specific range, which is mapped to step sizes larger than 0.01 dB step size, the reason for this claim is that in [6] the number of steps has been maintained while the step size has been reduced, although we have followed a different logic, which is reducing the step size while having more steps, therefore our results are different with [6]. Consequently we cannot use ADB and MFPD as the objective measures to make any conclusion as the glitch is audible where the ADB and MFPD are not able to evaluate the audibility.…”
Section: Subjective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.b). A Tuba music sample from the EBU Sound Quality Assessment Material CD [9], which lasts for 2.5s was chosen as the input of the channel (as it was reported to be the worst case scenario with regards to the level of the transient errors (glitches) based on [6]). For generating the sound files, initially each input signal was up-sampled by a factor of 8 from 44.1 kHz into 352.8 kHz to avoid the aliasing of the harmonic distortion which is the result of the AGC activity.…”
Section: A Production Of the Test Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation