Objective Criticism and Negative Conclusions on Using the Fuzzy SWARA Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Abstract

The quality of output or decision-making depends on high-quality input data, their adequate evaluation, the application of adequate approaches, and accurate calculation. In this paper, an objective criticism of applying the fuzzy SWARA (step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis) method based on the Chang TFN (triangular fuzzy number) scale is performed. Through research, it has been noticed that a large number of studies use this approach and, as an epilogue, there are wrong decisions based on inconsistent values in relation to the initial assessment of decision-makers (DMs). Seven representative studies (logistics, construction industry, financial performance management, and supply chain) with different parameter structures and decision matrix sizes have been singled out. The main hypothesis has been set, which implies that the application of this approach leads to wrong decisions because the weight values of the criteria are incorrect. A comparative analysis with the improved fuzzy SWARA (IMF SWARA) method has been created and a number of negative conclusions has been reached on using the fuzzy SWARA method and the Chang scale: Primarily, that using such an approach is impossible for two or more criteria to have equal value, that allocating TFN (1,1,1) leads to criteria values that are inconsistent with expert evaluation, that the last-ranked criteria in the fuzzy SWARA method have no influential value on the ranking of alternatives, that there is a great gap between the most significant and last-ranked criteria, and that the most significant criterion has a huge impact on the evaluation of alternative solutions and decision making. As a general conclusion, it is given that this approach is not adequate for application in problems of multi-criteria decision making because it produces inadequate management of processes and activities in various spheres.

Impact of the Number of Vehicles on Traffic Safety: Multiphase Modeling

“…The IMF SWARA method is a recently developed method presented byVrtagić et al [24]. It consists of the following steps [29,30].…”

Providing a Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Health Care Services Using the HealthQual Model and Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Under Imperfect Knowledge of Data

“…The initial version of this method was not efficient in the face of situations where decision makers' information is unreliable and incomplete. Stević et al (2022) discussed the use of the fuzzy SWARA method and proposed an improved approach to address the criticisms of this method. Considering the points raised about IVTFN numbers (eliminating the shortcomings of the traditional fuzzy approach in determining the exact value of the upper and lower bounds of the membership function), the development of this method based on this IVTFN numbers has been considered in this research.…”

Proposal for an objective binary benchmarking framework that validates each other for comparing MCDM methods through data analytics

“…It is therefore reasonable to use MCDM methods because of their success in considering the multidimensional nature of FP with precision. As a matter of fact, MCDM methods have been preferred as a selection and ranking method in many previous studies and in many different scientific fields ( Kabir & Hasin, 2013 ; Stević et al, 2022a ; Pala, 2022 ; Gvozdović et al, 2022 ; Oral, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ). Of course, a single criterion or ratio is insufficient for an overall assessment of the multidimensional performance of companies.…”