2017
DOI: 10.1167/17.10.865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object-based Attention Underlies the Storage of Event Files in Working Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.1). We focused on failures in higher‐order cognitive processing and more deliberate response selection processes (Hoffmann et al, 2014; Hoffmann & Beste, 2015; Hoffmann & Falkenstein, 2010; Pailing & Segalowitz, 2004) using a mental rotation paradigm as an experimental vehicle that also well connects to the theoretical framing relating to event files because event file coding processes can be taxed through working memory demands (Bernhard Hommel, 2004; Lu et al, 2017, 2019). This is because the event file concept shows strong connections with memory encoding and retrieval processes (Frings et al, 2020) partly because the event file has been conceptualized to reflect a memory trace specifying stimulus–response associations (Bernhard Hommel, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2.1). We focused on failures in higher‐order cognitive processing and more deliberate response selection processes (Hoffmann et al, 2014; Hoffmann & Beste, 2015; Hoffmann & Falkenstein, 2010; Pailing & Segalowitz, 2004) using a mental rotation paradigm as an experimental vehicle that also well connects to the theoretical framing relating to event files because event file coding processes can be taxed through working memory demands (Bernhard Hommel, 2004; Lu et al, 2017, 2019). This is because the event file concept shows strong connections with memory encoding and retrieval processes (Frings et al, 2020) partly because the event file has been conceptualized to reflect a memory trace specifying stimulus–response associations (Bernhard Hommel, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One means of doing so is to tax event file coding processes. Event file coding processes can be taxed through working memory demands (Hommel, 2004;Lu et al, 2017Lu et al, , 2019. This is because the event file concept shows strong connections with memory encoding and retrieval processes (Frings et al, 2020) partly because the event file has been conceptualized to reflect a memory trace specifying stimulus-response associations (Hommel, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available evidence from working memory research suggests that TBA is particularly relevant during the sequential coding of working memory items 82 . This sequential (episodic) structure of working memory encoding has strong similarities with event-file coding processes 15,92,93 central for BRAC 6 encompassing a memory trace specifying stimulus-response associations 43 . From that perspective, and considering BRAC also stressing the role of sequential primeprobe processes in commonly used experiments to measure action control, the role of TBA or surprise signals during action control may root in binding and retrieval processes and thus in the dynamic management of event-files reflecting episodic memory traces.…”
Section: Box 1 | Glossary Of Conceptual Terms and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 98%