2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obesity reduces uterine receptivity: clinical experience from 9,587 first cycles of ovum donation with normal weight donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
116
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
116
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…22 A recent data analyzing more than 9500 first cycles of ovum donation with ova from normal weight donors revealed that implantation and live birth rates were significantly reduced with increasing BMI. 23 Even if some authors suggest that the probable cause of unfavorable outcomes was linked with reduced uterine receptivity in obesity, we failed to reach such a conclusion as peak echo measurements and implantation rates were all comparable among BMI groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…22 A recent data analyzing more than 9500 first cycles of ovum donation with ova from normal weight donors revealed that implantation and live birth rates were significantly reduced with increasing BMI. 23 Even if some authors suggest that the probable cause of unfavorable outcomes was linked with reduced uterine receptivity in obesity, we failed to reach such a conclusion as peak echo measurements and implantation rates were all comparable among BMI groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…There are studies which stated that endometrial receptivity and reproductive outcome are broken as BMI increases. [15][16][17] The fact that the correlation between BMI and β-hCG is broken in the triplet pregnancies in this studies may be caused by the insufficient number of the patients in that group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…While environmental differences are hypothesized to underlie the observed associations between clinic location and donor egg IVF success, a number of unquantified variables could very well explain the observed directionality of association. Regional practice differences in IVF protocols, such as choice of ovarian suppression strategy, gonadotropin type and dose, and peak estradiol levels prior to ET [49], donor characteristics such as age and sibling donor [50], as well as regional differences in donor egg recipient profiles such as obesity [51], uterine factor [52,53], presence of hydrosalpinges [54] and even vitamin D deficiency [55] could underlie the observed phenomenon. The publically accessible data reported by SART include cumulative annual data for the reporting clinics; details on individual egg donors and recipients are lacking; similarly, in the absence of information on timing of the undertaken ART cycle/s, any inference regarding site specific UVB values during the time of ART cycle, or effect of seasonality cannot be attained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%