2008
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obesity prevalence from a European perspective: a systematic review

Abstract: BackgroundObesity has been recognised as an important contributing factor in the development of various diseases, but comparative data on this condition are limited. We therefore aimed to identify and discuss current epidemiological data on the prevalence of obesity in European countries.MethodsWe identified relevant published studies by means of a MEDLINE search (1990–2008) supplemented by information obtained from regulatory agencies. We only included surveys that used direct measures of weight and height an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

18
410
2
34

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 595 publications
(464 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
18
410
2
34
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be mentioned that the principal investigators of much larger and complete analyses of prevalence and trends of both adult and childhood overweight/obesity in Europe were also facing the same problem, mainly due to the limited number of national surveys monitoring overweight/obesity in Europe, and included regional and local surveys in their analyses instead. 4,7 The prevalence data obtained from our analysis could be of value in the near future in filling the gap of information about the trends of childhood overweight/obesity in some European countries. 4,6 In fact, in the most recently published investigation of such trends, no data were reported for Cyprus, Estonia and Italy, because of the lack of prospective comparable cohorts in these countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it should be mentioned that the principal investigators of much larger and complete analyses of prevalence and trends of both adult and childhood overweight/obesity in Europe were also facing the same problem, mainly due to the limited number of national surveys monitoring overweight/obesity in Europe, and included regional and local surveys in their analyses instead. 4,7 The prevalence data obtained from our analysis could be of value in the near future in filling the gap of information about the trends of childhood overweight/obesity in some European countries. 4,6 In fact, in the most recently published investigation of such trends, no data were reported for Cyprus, Estonia and Italy, because of the lack of prospective comparable cohorts in these countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Importantly, these data confirmed the already known North-South gradient of overweight/obesity in Europe. 4,7 The analysis of modifying factors, such as birthweight, parental obesity, and education level and parental smoking habit, suggested that these factors should always be assessed taking age and gender specificities into account. Finally, a relevant finding of the Overweight and obesity in European children I Pigeot et al present analysis is that the already described association of overweight/obesity with high blood pressure [22][23][24] was present with a similar strength in all surveys under investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly in Europe, the prevalence of obesity in men ranged from 4.0% to 28.3% and in women from 6.2% to 36.5% during the period 1980-2005. Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean countries showed higher prevalences of obesity than countries in Western and Northern Europe (Berghöfer et al, 2008). The alarming rise of obesity over the years has led to the practice of a new form of discrimination that has received relatively little attention in the economics literature -weight discrimination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies investigating obesity trends are based on cross-sectional survey data (14)(15)(16) . Cross-sectional studies and synthetic cohorts (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%