2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obesity and the challenges of caesarean delivery: Prevention and management of wound complications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The profile for participant 1 is partly occluded by adjacent structures (hair). From the difference between healthy ''reference'' skin and scar/wound temperature (deltaT), pixel differences along the scar/wound margin (Fig 2c) differ, for the majority of women, by not more than 1 o C. In four participants (6,9,11,16) deltaT reveals four predominately negative deltaT plots, indicating lower scar/wound temperatures of up to 4 o C. In two women, (participant 6, 16) the scar at days 15 and 11 respectively were infected. In participant 11, the scar at day 2 was ''lumpy''; the low deltaT along the scar indicating that the scar edge was at a consistently lower temperature than adjacent healthy (reference) skin.…”
Section: Edge Analysis and Quantitative Temperature Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The profile for participant 1 is partly occluded by adjacent structures (hair). From the difference between healthy ''reference'' skin and scar/wound temperature (deltaT), pixel differences along the scar/wound margin (Fig 2c) differ, for the majority of women, by not more than 1 o C. In four participants (6,9,11,16) deltaT reveals four predominately negative deltaT plots, indicating lower scar/wound temperatures of up to 4 o C. In two women, (participant 6, 16) the scar at days 15 and 11 respectively were infected. In participant 11, the scar at day 2 was ''lumpy''; the low deltaT along the scar indicating that the scar edge was at a consistently lower temperature than adjacent healthy (reference) skin.…”
Section: Edge Analysis and Quantitative Temperature Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Obesity and SSI risk is now a matter for increasing concern in women undergoing caesarean section. 11,12 After abdominal delivery and caesarean section, infection can occur in all three of the SSI categories; superficial incisional SSI, deep incisional SSI and organ (or space) SSI. 13 Typically infection of skin and superficial tissues is most common after caesarean birth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that closure of the subcutaneous tissue (if over 2-3 cm in depth) and avoidance of subcutaneous drains decrease the chance of wound complications in obese patients [70][71][72].…”
Section: Surgical Skin Incision Choices a -Pfannensteil B -Supraumbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a large multicenter randomized trial, obese women with subcutaneous drains had similar rates of wound complications as those with subcutaneous fat closure only [85]. However, more recent studies suggest that the subcutaneous tissue should be closed if more than 2-3 cm deep, and subcutaneous drains should be avoided to prevent surgical site infections [70][71][72].…”
Section: Prevention Of Surgical Site Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that way, antibiotic prophylaxis in these patients is different, and the actual recommendation is to administer at least 2 g of cefazolin some 60 minutes before the cesarean section. Another recommendation is to close the subcutaneous tissue layer in obese patients particularly when its depth exceeds 2 cm [43].…”
Section: Obesity and Gynecological Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%